Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion regarding the transfer of SAREB real estate assets to Galicia for their management.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 23 February 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000145· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced23 February 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted27 February 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary1 March 2024All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Dec 202411. 23 February 2024: Presentación22. 27 February 2024: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 27/02/2024 hasta 01/03/202433. 27 February 2024: Calificación44. 1 March 2024: Pleno desde 01/03/2024 hasta 24/09/202555. 24 September 2025: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 24/09/2025 hasta 02/10/2025

24 September 2025

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 57 yes · 169 no · 122 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion from the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Mr. Rego Candamil), regarding the transfer of real estate assets from SAREB to Galicia for their management. It is voted in the terms resulting from the incorporation of the amendment presented by the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Mr. Rego Candamil).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 134· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 5 most voted in favour; in 34, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 5
  • Against: 34
  • Abstained: 2
  • Tie: 11
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR26
25 in favour · 1 did not vote
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista120
120 abst.
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Junts per Catalunya7
7 in favour
Mixto9
7 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst.
Popular en el Congreso137
136 against · 1 abst.
VOX33
32 against · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.