What it is
Bill would make serious child sexual abuse crimes never expire
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 22 March 2024. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma de Cataluña - Parlamento.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending the statute of limitations for sexual freedom crimes committed against minors.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000007· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill proposes that sexual offenses committed against minors should never expire when the maximum penalty is five or more years in prison. These crimes would join the list of crimes that never expire, alongside crimes against humanity, genocide, terrorism causing death, and crimes in armed conflict.
- For other sexual offenses against minors that would still expire, the bill proposes that the time limit start counting when the victim turns forty-five, instead of the current thirty-five. This would give victims at least until age fifty to report the facts.
- The bill also proposes that sentences handed down for these serious sexual offenses against minors should never expire, so that whenever the criminal case does not expire, serving the sentence does not expire either.
- When a sexual offense against a minor is committed by another minor, the bill proposes a special ten-year time limit, counted from when the victim turns thirty-five, or from the victim's death if that happens earlier.
- The explanatory statement justifies the change because victims usually report very late, on average around age forty-two, and many cases have already expired by the time they report. It also cites international recommendations calling for eliminating or greatly extending these time limits.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette. This is a bill admitted for processing in the Congress of Deputies (Congreso de los Diputados), not an approved law.
Who it affects
- People who suffered sexual abuse as minors: They would have more time, or unlimited time in the most serious cases, to report the facts.
- Victims of sexual offenses committed by minors: They would have a ten-year period starting when they turn thirty-five to have the facts prosecuted.
- People convicted of these crimes: Sentences for the most serious crimes would no longer expire, so they could be served with no time limit.
- People reporting abuse in institutions: Their cases would no longer expire so easily before they are able to report.
Words worth knowing
- Prescripción
- The crime or sentence 'expires' over time: once the legally set period passes, the case can no longer be tried or the sentence served.
- Imprescriptibilidad
- The crime never expires: it can be reported and prosecuted no matter how much time has passed.
- Ley orgánica
- A type of Spanish law reserved for major matters, such as the Penal Code, requiring a special vote in Congress.
- Sentencia firme
- A court ruling that can no longer be appealed, meaning it is final.
- Proposición de ley
- A bill: a text in the form of a law still being processed in Congress, which may be approved, amended, or rejected.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced22 March 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted2 April 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments22 November 2024Groups propose changes.
- Committee26 February 2026A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
12 November 2024
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the Parliament of Catalonia, amending the statute of limitations for crimes against sexual freedom committed against minors (Organic).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 74· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 10 yes · 2 no
- Almería More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 30 yes · 2 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 8 yes · 1 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 29 yes · 5 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 8 yes · 2 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 8 yes · 2 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 9 yes · 1 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 11 yes · 2 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya, Mixto and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 20 in favour · 7 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Mixto | 8 | 7 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 133 in favour · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 32 against · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000007
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 74
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.