Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would impose harsher penalties for praising terrorism by public officials

Amendments step 3 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 18 September 2025. Introduced by: Senado.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Article 578 of Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, of the Penal Code.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 124/000034· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would add a new section to Article 578 of the Criminal Code, the offense of glorifying terrorism, to punish those acts more severely when committed by a public authority, a public official or a representative of a political party.
  2. In that case, the penalties would be those of the previous section in its upper half, plus a fine of three months and one day to twelve months.
  3. In addition, the person would always be barred from holding public office and from running as a candidate for one to five years.
  4. If passed, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado). For now it is a bill in progress, not an approved law.

Who it affects

  • Public authorities, public officials and representatives of political parties: They could face harsher penalties if they glorify or justify terrorism or humiliate the victims of terrorism.
  • Victims of terrorism and their families: The bill aims to protect them from humiliation and contempt by people holding public positions.

Words worth knowing

Enaltecimiento del terrorismo
A crime that punishes glorifying or justifying terrorism or its perpetrators, or humiliating and showing contempt for its victims.
Inhabilitación especial
A penalty that bars a person from holding public office for a set period.
Sufragio pasivo
The right to run as a candidate in elections.
Proposición de ley
A text proposed as a law that is not yet approved and may change while it is being processed.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced18 September 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted23 September 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments26 September 2025Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Sept 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026Sept 202611. 18 September 2025: Presentación22. 23 September 2025: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 23/09/2025 hasta 26/09/202533. 23 September 2025: Calificación44. 26 September 2025: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 26/09/2025 hasta 06/10/202655. 6 October 2026: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 06/10/2026 hasta 04/11/2026

Was there a plenary vote?

We have no plenary vote linked to this law in the Congreso’s data.

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.