What it is
Bill to strengthen the Women's Institute and its power to sue
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 29 May 2026. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill to amend Law 16/1983, of October 24, creating the Institute for Women, and certain procedural laws within its scope of competence.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000285· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would designate the Institute of Women (Instituto de las Mujeres) as the equality body for two 2024 European directives on equality bodies, and as the body overseeing non-discrimination based on sex in high-risk artificial intelligence systems.
- It would expand the Institute's purposes and functions: independently assisting victims of discrimination, issuing reports on draft rules, investigating discrimination situations, and acting to defend collective or diffuse interests.
- It would regulate the Institute's presidency as a senior office with the rank of undersecretary, appointed by royal decree among people of recognized standing, through a public preselection process with participation by the Council for the Participation of Women. It would also repeal article six of the founding law.
- It would amend three procedural laws so the Institute of Women can go to court to defend the right to equality and non-discrimination, including when the victims are an indeterminate group of people.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- Women who suffer discrimination based on sex, who could receive assistance and support from the Institute.: The Institute of Women, whose powers, functions and resources would be expanded.
- Public administrations and companies using artificial intelligence, which would be subject to the Institute's oversight on non-discrimination.: Political parties, unions, associations and organizations that could litigate alongside the Institute in discrimination cases.
Words worth knowing
- Organismo de igualdad (equality body)
- An official public body that monitors compliance with the right to equal treatment between women and men and helps people who face discrimination.
- Intereses difusos (diffuse interests)
- Rights that affect a large, indeterminate group of people, where no single person can sue separately.
- Jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa (administrative courts)
- The courts that review decisions made by public administrations.
- Jurisdicción social (labor courts)
- The courts that handle labor disputes and Social Security cases.
- Proposición de ley (bill)
- A proposed law introduced by parliamentary groups that still must be debated and passed by the Congress.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced29 May 2026Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted2 June 2026The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
16 June 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, to amend Law 16/1983, of 24 October, on the creation of the Institute for Women and of certain procedural laws within its competence.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 186· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 22 yes · 8 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 14 yes · 20 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 7 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista and Mixto. Against, most of Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 30, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 30
- Tie: 11
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 25 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Socialista | 121 | 120 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 1 against · 4 abst. |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 5 against · 2 did not vote |
| Mixto | 8 | 8 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 135 against · 2 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 33 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000285
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 186
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.