Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would ban full-face veils in public and transfer powers to Catalonia

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 17 February 2026. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Junts per Catalunya.

Official title: Private member's Organic bill on the regulation of the use of full veils and the delegation to the Autonomous Community of Catalonia of state competences in matters of security and identification of persons.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000256· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would ban wearing garments in public spaces that cover the face totally or substantially and prevent identifying the person. It expressly mentions the niqab and the burka.
  2. Public space would include the street and any space open to or used by the public, including transportation, administrative offices and facilities open to the public.
  3. The ban would not apply for accredited health reasons, under workplace safety rules, in justified sports, cultural, festive or traditional activities, or when an authority requires protective equipment. When identification is needed, the person would have to briefly uncover the face.
  4. The bill would delegate to the Generalitat de Catalunya executive powers over security, including functions in ports and airports, border control, and issuing the DNI, passport and NIE Número de Identidad de Extranjero, the ID number for foreigners in Spain..
  5. Rules of equal or lower rank that conflict with the law would be repealed, and the law would take effect the day after its publication in the official state gazette.

Who it affects

  • People who wear face-covering garments, such as the niqab or burka: They could not wear them in public spaces, except for the stated exceptions.
  • The Generalitat de Catalunya and the Mossos d'Esquadra police: They would receive delegated powers over security, border control and issuing identity documents.
  • Anyone who needs to identify themselves to access public services: They would have to briefly uncover their face before the authority or authorized staff.

Words worth knowing

Ley orgánica (organic law)
A type of Spanish law used to regulate fundamental rights. It requires a special majority in Congress to pass.
Proposición de ley
A bill introduced by a parliamentary group. It is not a law until it is passed.
NIE
Número de Identidad de Extranjero, the ID number for foreigners in Spain.
Derogar (repeal)
To cancel a previous rule so it no longer applies.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced17 February 2026Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted24 February 2026The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Feb 2026Mar 202611. 17 February 2026: Presentación22. 24 February 2026: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 24/02/2026 hasta 27/02/202633. 24 February 2026: Calificación44. 27 February 2026: Gobierno Contestación desde 27/02/2026 hasta 08/04/202655. 8 April 2026: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 08/04/2026 hasta 14/04/202666. 14 April 2026: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 14/04/2026 hasta 20/04/2026

14 April 2026

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 7 yes · 327 no · 13 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Junts per Catalunya Parliamentary Group, Organic bill on the regulation of the use of full veils and the delegation to the Autonomous Community of Catalonia of state competences in matters of security and identification of persons.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 171· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Junts per Catalunya. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Socialista, Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 52, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 52
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR26
25 against · 1 did not vote
Republicano7
7 abst.
Socialista121
120 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 abst.
Junts per Catalunya7
7 in favour
Mixto8
7 against · 1 abst.
Popular en el Congreso137
137 against
VOX33
32 against · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.