What it is
Bill would bar terrorism convicts from jobs with minors
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 2 December 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.
Official title: Private member's bill to amend Royal Legislative Decree 5/2015, of October 30, approving the consolidated text of the Law on the Basic Statute of the Public Employee, and Law 38/2003, of November 17, General Law on Subsidies.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000245· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill, introduced by the Mixed Parliamentary Group at the initiative of a lawmaker from UPN, seeks to prevent people convicted of terrorism offenses from holding public jobs with regular contact with minors. It is a bill in the legislative process, not an approved law.
- It would require, as a condition to enter selection processes for jobs involving repeated and direct contact with minors, not having a final conviction for terrorism offenses. Applicants would have to prove this with a criminal record certificate, and court rulings from other European Union member states would count as well.
- It would bar people convicted of these offenses from receiving public subsidies for projects aimed at minors, as well as companies or entities that employ or subcontract them. The ban would apply automatically and would have to be proven with criminal record certificates from everyone taking part in the project.
- If approved, the law would repeal any conflicting rules and would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- People convicted of terrorism offenses: They could not apply for public jobs with regular contact with minors or receive subsidies for projects aimed at minors.
- People seeking public jobs working with minors: They would have to submit a criminal record certificate showing no terrorism convictions.
- Entities applying for subsidies for activities with minors: They could not receive aid if anyone working on the project has a terrorism conviction, and would have to prove this with certificates.
- Public administrations and educators: They would have to require and verify these conditions in selection processes and subsidy calls.
Words worth knowing
- Sentencia firme
- A court ruling that can no longer be appealed and is therefore final.
- Registro Central de Penados
- The official registry of criminal records for people convicted in Spain.
- Entidad colaboradora
- A person or entity that helps manage and distribute a public subsidy.
- Proposición de ley
- A bill introduced by a parliamentary group, which still must be debated and passed by the Congress.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced2 December 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted9 December 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
17 March 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the Mixed Parliamentary Group, for the amendment of Royal Legislative Decree 5/2015, of October 30, approving the consolidated text of the Basic Statute of the Public Employee Law and Law 38/2003, of November 17, General Subsidies Law.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 165· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 24 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 21 yes · 14 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 30 most voted in favour; in 10, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 30
- Against: 10
- Tie: 12
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 24 against · 2 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 121 | 119 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 8 | 1 in favour · 6 against · 1 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 in favour |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000245
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 165
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.