What it is
Bill to stop the Government from moving money between ministries without Congress
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 15 November 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill to guarantee compliance with Law 47/2003, of November 26, General Budget Law.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000241· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would repeal section one of Article 9 of the 2023 State Budget Law, which allows the Government to move funds between sections for what it calls unavoidable needs. It would also expressly ban credit transfers between sections, as provided in Article 52.2 of the General Budget Law.
- The bill would amend Article 55 of the General Budget Law to require that extraordinary or supplementary credits for defense and security be approved through a bill submitted to the Cortes Generales (Spanish Parliament).
- Any provisions of equal or lower rank that conflict with the law would be repealed.
- The law would be enacted under the State's powers over the bases and coordination of economic planning and over general treasury and State debt, and would take effect upon publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- The Government: It would lose the ability to move money between ministries without going through Parliament and would have to submit extra defense spending to Congress.
- The Cortes Generales (Spanish Parliament): They would regain control over budget reallocations and defense credits.
- The ministries: They could no longer receive or give up funds through transfers between sections.
Words worth knowing
- Transferencia de crédito (credit transfer)
- Moving money from one budget line to another.
- Sección presupuestaria (budget section)
- Each block of the budget, usually a ministry or public body.
- Créditos extraordinarios o suplementarios (extraordinary or supplementary credits)
- Additional money added to the budget for unplanned or underfunded expenses.
- Ley General Presupuestaria (General Budget Law)
- A 2003 law setting the rules for how the State budget is drawn up and spent.
- Prórroga presupuestaria (budget extension)
- Keeping the previous year's budget in force when no new budget is passed.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced15 November 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted18 November 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments20 February 2026Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
10 February 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill from the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, to guarantee compliance with Law 47/2003, of 26 November, General Budget Law.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 157· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 22 no · 3 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 21 yes · 14 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista and Mixto. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 32 most voted in favour; in 10, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 32
- Against: 10
- Tie: 10
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 25 against · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 121 | 119 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 abst. |
| Mixto | 8 | 2 in favour · 5 against · 1 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 in favour |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000241
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 157
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.