Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would let judges choose the judicial members of the CGPJ

Admitted step 2 of 7· Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 24 October 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Organic Private member's bill to amend Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, to change the model for the election of the members of the General Council of the Judiciary.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000229· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would change how the twelve judicial members of the General Council of the Judiciary (Consejo General del Poder Judicial) are chosen: they would be elected by judges and magistrates themselves, not by Parliament. The Council would keep twenty members: twelve judges or magistrates and eight jurists elected by the Congress of Deputies and the Senate.
  2. The proposal responds to a mandate from Organic Law 3/2024, which asked the Council for a reform proposal approved by three fifths of its members. Since that majority was not reached, the Council sent two options, and the Government has not pushed for the change, according to the explanatory statement.
  3. The judicial election would use a single district for all of Spain, in-person or mail voting, a single ballot with an open list, and limited voting for a maximum of eight candidates. Each candidate would need twenty endorsements from judges or the endorsement of a judicial association.
  4. Balanced representation of women and men would be guaranteed: at least 40% of each sex among both the twelve judicial members and the eight jurists elected by the Chambers.
  5. An Electoral Board made up of Supreme Court magistrates would be created to organize the election, handle complaints, and proclaim the winners. That proclamation could be challenged before the Supreme Court.
  6. The new system would apply from the call for the renewal, three months before the current Council's term expires. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.

Who it affects

  • Judges and magistrates: They would elect the twelve judicial members of the Council and could run as candidates or endorse them.
  • Congress of Deputies and Senate: They would keep electing the eight jurist members by a three-fifths majority, but would no longer take part in choosing the judge members.
  • Judicial associations: They could present a full slate of twelve candidates or endorse up to eight individual candidates.
  • General Council of the Judiciary: It would have to approve the electoral rules by a three-fifths majority and provide support and resources for the whole process.

Words worth knowing

Vocal
A member of the General Council of the Judiciary, the body that governs Spanish judges.
Tres quintos (three fifths)
A reinforced majority: three out of every five members of a Chamber must vote in favor.
Turno judicial y turno de juristas (judicial and jurist tracks)
The two ways to become a Council member: coming from the judicial career or being a jurist of recognized competence.
Avales (endorsements)
Support signatures from other judges or magistrates that a candidate needs to run.
Recurso contencioso-administrativo
A court appeal used to challenge decisions by public authorities.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced24 October 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted28 October 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 202611. 24 October 2025: Presentación22. 28 October 2025: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 28/10/2025 hasta 31/10/202533. 28 October 2025: Calificación44. 31 October 2025: Gobierno Contestación desde 31/10/2025 hasta 11/12/202555. 11 December 2025: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 11/12/2025 hasta 10/09/202666. 10 September 2026: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 10/09/2026 hasta 15/09/2026

10 September 2026

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 170 yes · 175 no

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, Organic bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, for the change of the model for the election of the members of the General Council of the Judiciary.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 15 of sitting 196· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 30 most voted in favour; in 10, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 30
  • Against: 10
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR26
26 against
Republicano7
6 against · 1 did not vote
Socialista121
119 against · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto9
3 in favour · 6 against
Popular en el Congreso137
136 in favour · 1 did not vote
VOX32
31 in favour · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.