What it is
Bill would let judges choose the judicial members of the CGPJ
Admitted step 2 of 7· RejectedIt is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 24 October 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Organic Private member's bill to amend Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, to change the model for the election of the members of the General Council of the Judiciary.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000229· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would change how the twelve judicial members of the General Council of the Judiciary (Consejo General del Poder Judicial) are chosen: they would be elected by judges and magistrates themselves, not by Parliament. The Council would keep twenty members: twelve judges or magistrates and eight jurists elected by the Congress of Deputies and the Senate.
- The proposal responds to a mandate from Organic Law 3/2024, which asked the Council for a reform proposal approved by three fifths of its members. Since that majority was not reached, the Council sent two options, and the Government has not pushed for the change, according to the explanatory statement.
- The judicial election would use a single district for all of Spain, in-person or mail voting, a single ballot with an open list, and limited voting for a maximum of eight candidates. Each candidate would need twenty endorsements from judges or the endorsement of a judicial association.
- Balanced representation of women and men would be guaranteed: at least 40% of each sex among both the twelve judicial members and the eight jurists elected by the Chambers.
- An Electoral Board made up of Supreme Court magistrates would be created to organize the election, handle complaints, and proclaim the winners. That proclamation could be challenged before the Supreme Court.
- The new system would apply from the call for the renewal, three months before the current Council's term expires. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- Judges and magistrates: They would elect the twelve judicial members of the Council and could run as candidates or endorse them.
- Congress of Deputies and Senate: They would keep electing the eight jurist members by a three-fifths majority, but would no longer take part in choosing the judge members.
- Judicial associations: They could present a full slate of twelve candidates or endorse up to eight individual candidates.
- General Council of the Judiciary: It would have to approve the electoral rules by a three-fifths majority and provide support and resources for the whole process.
Words worth knowing
- Vocal
- A member of the General Council of the Judiciary, the body that governs Spanish judges.
- Tres quintos (three fifths)
- A reinforced majority: three out of every five members of a Chamber must vote in favor.
- Turno judicial y turno de juristas (judicial and jurist tracks)
- The two ways to become a Council member: coming from the judicial career or being a jurist of recognized competence.
- Avales (endorsements)
- Support signatures from other judges or magistrates that a candidate needs to run.
- Recurso contencioso-administrativo
- A court appeal used to challenge decisions by public authorities.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced24 October 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted28 October 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
10 September 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, Organic bill amending Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, for the change of the model for the election of the members of the General Council of the Judiciary.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 15 of sitting 196· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 25 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 21 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 30 most voted in favour; in 10, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 30
- Against: 10
- Tie: 12
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 26 against |
| Republicano | 7 | 6 against · 1 did not vote |
| Socialista | 121 | 119 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 9 | 3 in favour · 6 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 136 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 32 | 31 in favour · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000229
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 15 of sitting 196
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.