What it is
Proposal to expand life imprisonment to more murder cases
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 18 October 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, on the Penal Code, to expand the cases in which the imposition of the reviewable life imprisonment penalty is foreseen.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000226· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would expand the cases in which revisable permanent imprisonment can be imposed for murder. It focuses on two situations: hiding the victim's body and committing murder again after a prior conviction.
- Today murder carries a prison sentence of fifteen to twenty-five years. The bill would make revisable permanent imprisonment the penalty in those two cases, and revealing where the body is could help the convicted person get their sentence suspended.
- The text adds two cases to Article 140 of the Criminal Code: when the convicted person made the victim's body disappear or did not say where it is, and when the offender had previously been convicted of murder.
- If approved, the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- People convicted of murder: Could receive revisable permanent imprisonment if they made the victim's body disappear or did not reveal where it is.
- People previously convicted of murder who offend again: Could receive revisable permanent imprisonment if they commit murder again after a prior conviction for that crime.
- Relatives and loved ones of murder victims: The bill seeks to spare them the added pain of not being able to bury their relative.
Words worth knowing
- Prisión permanente revisable (revisable permanent imprisonment)
- The harshest prison penalty in the Spanish Criminal Code. It is not final: the convicted person can request release after serving at least twenty-five years.
- Proposición de ley orgánica (organic law bill)
- A bill introduced in Congress to change a law affecting fundamental rights. It needs an absolute majority to pass. This one is not approved yet.
- Reincidencia (repeat offense)
- Committing the same crime again after having been convicted of it.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced18 October 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted21 October 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
17 March 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, Organic bill amending Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, on the Criminal Code, to expand the cases in which the imposition of the reviewable life imprisonment penalty is provided for.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 165· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 24 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 21 yes · 14 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 31 most voted in favour; in 10, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 31
- Against: 10
- Tie: 11
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 24 against · 2 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 121 | 119 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 8 | 2 in favour · 6 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 in favour |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000226
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 13 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 165
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.