What it is
Bill would let judges decide cases of children in neglect
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 24 June 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.
Official title: Private member's bill amending the Civil Code for the protection of minors in care in a situation of abandonment.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000209· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill proposes that declaring a child in a situation of neglect (desamparo) and granting guardianship to the public entity would no longer be decided by the administration, but by a court ruling, which must be notified to parents and the child within 48 hours at most.
- Priority would be given to returning the child to their birth family or, failing that, the extended family, and the judge would have to take this into account whenever possible and positive for the child.
- Parents or guardians with suspended parental authority would have two years from notification to ask that the neglect declaration be revoked if circumstances change, and after that period only the Public Prosecutor could challenge court decisions.
- Temporary care of a child by the public entity could not exceed two years, except for an exceptional extension in the child's best interest, and after that period the child must return to their parents or be declared in neglect.
- The bill removes any gender-based reference from the rules on risk situations, and states that no ideological motivation could ever be grounds to open a neglect declaration process.
- Case files pending when the law takes effect would be processed under the new legislation, and the law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- Children in guardianship or in a situation of neglect: Their cases would be decided by a judge, and returning to their birth or extended family would be prioritized.
- Parents and guardians of children in neglect: They would have two years to request revocation of the declaration and could challenge protection decisions.
- Public child protection entities: They would need court rulings to take on guardianship and care, and would end guardianship when the causes disappear.
- Public Prosecutor (Ministerio Fiscal): Its supervisory role would be strengthened, and it would be the only party allowed to challenge rulings after two years.
Words worth knowing
- Desamparo (neglect)
- A situation where a child lacks the necessary moral or material care because those responsible for them fail to meet their duties.
- Tutela (guardianship)
- Legal responsibility to care for and represent a minor, which in these cases would pass to the public entity by court decision.
- Patria potestad (parental authority)
- The set of rights and duties parents have over their minor children.
- Acogimiento familiar (family foster care)
- A measure whereby a child lives with a family other than their own, usually relatives, when they cannot stay with their parents.
- Ministerio Fiscal (Public Prosecutor)
- Public body that protects the interests of minors and acts in court proceedings affecting them.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced24 June 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted8 July 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
28 April 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the VOX Parliamentary Group, to amend the Civil Code, for the protection of minors in care in a situation of abandonment.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 175· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 4 abst.
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 2 yes · 5 no · 5 abst.
- Almería More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 3 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Badajoz More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Barcelona More votes against 2 yes · 25 no · 5 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 0 yes · 7 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Cádiz More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 4 abst.
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Ceuta Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ciudad Real More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Córdoba More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Jaén More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- León More votes against 0 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Madrid More votes against 5 yes · 16 no · 16 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 5 abst.
- Melilla Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Murcia More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 4 abst.
- Navarra More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Sevilla More votes against 1 yes · 7 no · 4 abst.
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Toledo More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 3 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes against 2 yes · 8 no · 6 abst.
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 15, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 0
- Against: 15
- Abstained: 15
- Tie: 22
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 26 against |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 121 | 121 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 6 against · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 8 | 7 against · 1 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 abst. |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000209
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 175
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.