Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would give celiac patients up to €600 a year

Amendments step 3 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 20 May 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill on economic compensation for people with celiac disease.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000194· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would create a State Registry of Celiac Disease Patients, attached to the Ministry of Health. It would track how many cases exist and give the Tax Agency the list of people entitled to the benefit.
  2. It would allow a deduction of up to €600 a year from personal income tax The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings. for each family member with celiac disease listed in the registry. The deduction would be refundable even if no tax is due, and an advance payment could be requested.
  3. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette, except for measures affecting the budget, which would wait until the next budgetary year.
  4. The explanatory statement justifies the benefit by the estimated annual extra cost of €997.85 for gluten-free food, according to the Federation of Celiac Associations of Spain (FACE).

Who it affects

  • People diagnosed with celiac disease and listed in the registry: They could apply a deduction of up to €600 a year from personal income tax.
  • Families with a celiac member: They could add the deduction for each affected member and request advance payment.
  • Ministry of Health: It would manage the new state patient registry.
  • Tax Agency (Agencia Tributaria): It would receive the list of people entitled to the deduction and pay the benefit.

Words worth knowing

IRPF
Spanish personal income tax, paid on income such as wages.
Cuota diferencial
The amount of income tax still owed or refunded after deductions are applied.
Deducción reembolsable
A refundable deduction: paid back to the taxpayer even if no tax is due that year.
Proposición de ley
A bill: a proposed law introduced by a parliamentary group, not yet passed.
income tax
The personal income tax (IRPF in Spain): what people pay on what they earn from work, business or savings.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced20 May 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted27 May 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments31 October 2025Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2025Sept 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026Sept 202611. 20 May 2025: Presentación22. 27 May 2025: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 27/05/2025 hasta 30/05/202533. 27 May 2025: Calificación44. 30 May 2025: Gobierno Contestación desde 30/05/2025 hasta 05/09/202555. 5 September 2025: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 05/09/2025 hasta 21/10/202566. 21 October 2025: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 21/10/2025 hasta 28/10/202577. 28 October 2025: Comisión de Hacienda y Función Pública Publicación desde 28/10/2025 hasta 31/10/202588. 31 October 2025: Comisión de Hacienda y Función Pública Enmiendas desde 31/10/2025 hasta 06/10/202699. 6 October 2026: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 06/10/2026 hasta 04/11/2026

21 October 2025

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 338 yes · 3 no · 4 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill from the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, on economic compensation for people with celiac disease.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 140· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya, Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 7 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 52
  • Against: 0
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
5 in favour · 1 did not vote
Plurinacional SUMAR26
24 in favour · 1 against · 1 did not vote
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista120
115 in favour · 2 against · 3 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Junts per Catalunya7
7 in favour
Mixto9
5 in favour · 4 abst.
Popular en el Congreso137
137 in favour
VOX33
33 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.