Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would protect traditional coastal towns from the Coastal Law

Amendments step 3 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 10 April 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill on the amendment of Law 22/1988, of July 28, on Coasts, for the preservation of traditional typology coastal urban ensembles and other facilities of public interest, on land that has become public maritime-terrestrial domain.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000181· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill seeks to protect traditional coastal urban areas that, because the shoreline has moved inland, have ended up on public maritime-land domain and could be evicted or demolished.
  2. The bill would allow assets declared of cultural interest and local cultural assets located on the maritime-land public domain to be removed from it through a boundary-setting process, and to be governed as if they were in the protection easement zone.
  3. It would also create the category of urban areas with special ethnological value: residential or commercial groups with cultural, historical or ethnological value, integrated into the coastal setting and existing before they became part of the public domain. Those areas would be excluded from the public domain through a boundary-setting process.
  4. The General Coastal Regulations would be amended to govern facilities for federated nautical sports, such as sailing clubs, and to require extended concessions to adapt to the regulations within the first third of the extension period, with expiration if they do not.

Who it affects

  • Residents and businesses in traditional coastal areas on the public maritime-land domain: They could keep their homes and premises if the area is cataloged and excluded through the boundary process.
  • Coastal town councils: They would have to certify the area's values and request its cataloging from the Ministry.
  • Coastal regional governments: They would have to issue a favorable report on the area's values and list the assets in their cultural heritage catalog.
  • Sailing clubs and federated nautical sports: The size and conditions of their beach facilities would be regulated.
  • Holders of extended concessions: They would have to adapt their titles within the first third of the extension period or lose the concession.

Words worth knowing

Dominio público marítimo-terrestre (public maritime-land domain)
Land along the seashore, such as beaches, that is public and cannot be privately owned.
Deslinde (boundary-setting process)
Official procedure that draws the exact limit of the public domain and decides which land and buildings fall inside or outside it.
Zona de servidumbre de protección (protection easement zone)
A strip of land next to the public domain where people can own property but with limits on how they use it.
Concesión (concession)
An administrative permit to use a public asset for a period of time, without becoming its owner.
Valores etnológicos (ethnological values)
Cultural values tied to the ways of life and traditions of a place.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced10 April 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted15 April 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments20 June 2025Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2025Sept 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026Sept 202611. 10 April 2025: Presentación22. 15 April 2025: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 15/04/2025 hasta 21/04/202533. 15 April 2025: Calificación44. 15 April 2025: Mesa del Congreso Calificación por Mesa sin reunión desde 15/04/2025 hasta 15/04/202555. 21 April 2025: Gobierno Contestación desde 21/04/2025 hasta 30/05/202566. 30 May 2025: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 30/05/2025 hasta 10/06/202577. 10 June 2025: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 10/06/2025 hasta 17/06/202588. 17 June 2025: Comisión de Transición Ecológica y Reto Demográfico Publicación desde 17/06/2025 hasta 20/06/202599. 20 June 2025: Comisión de Transición Ecológica y Reto Demográfico Enmiendas desde 20/06/2025 hasta 06/10/20261010. 6 October 2026: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 06/10/2026 hasta 04/11/2026

10 June 2025

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 189 yes · 155 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, relating to the amendment of Law 22/1988, of July 28, on Coasts, for the preservation of traditional typology coastal urban ensembles and other facilities of public interest, on lands that have become maritime-terrestrial public domain.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 116· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Republicano, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Socialista and Mixto. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 33 most voted in favour; in 7, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 33
  • Against: 7
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR27
26 against · 1 did not vote
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista120
118 against · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Junts per Catalunya7
7 in favour
Mixto8
2 in favour · 4 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
135 in favour · 1 against · 1 did not vote
VOX33
33 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.