Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to extend the life of Spain's nuclear plants

Amendments step 3 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 4 April 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill to guarantee the contribution of nuclear energy to the decarbonization of the energy system.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000179· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would allow nuclear power plants to keep running until their owner decides to shut them down or until the Nuclear Safety Council says they no longer meet safety conditions. The closing dates set as a "final and last renewal" in the licenses of Almaraz, Ascó I and Cofrentes would no longer apply.
  2. License extension requests would have to be filed at least fifteen months before the license expires. Also, if there is a serious risk to the security or continuity of the electricity supply, the State Secretariat for Energy could order a plant to keep operating.
  3. It would require ENRESA Public company that manages radioactive waste and the dismantling of nuclear plants. to update the 7th General Radioactive Waste Plan within three months, assuming ten extra years of plant operation beyond the closure protocol. That plan would need a report justifying every expense, which the Government would have to approve within six months.
  4. It asks the Government to respect technological neutrality in the next update of the National Integrated Energy and Climate Plan, not to plan the closure of any existing nuclear plant, and to give equal weight to sustainability, competitiveness and supply security.
  5. It asks the Government to update the National Energy Security Strategy within six months, especially assessing how a possible nuclear plant closure would affect supply security.
  6. It would allow a plant that closed because its license expired to reopen, always with a favorable report from the Nuclear Safety Council. If less than twelve months have passed since the shutdown, the request is processed as a routine extension.

Who it affects

  • Companies that own nuclear power plants: They could request extensions as many times as they want and operate beyond the planned closing dates.
  • ENRESA: It would have to update the radioactive waste plan within three months and justify every expense in a report.
  • The Government: It would be asked to update the PNIEC National Integrated Energy and Climate Plan: the Government's roadmap to meet energy and climate targets. and the National Energy Security Strategy under technological neutrality criteria.
  • Households and businesses that buy electricity: According to the explanatory statement, the goal is to avoid price increases and guarantee supply.
  • The Nuclear Safety Council: Its favorable report would be required for extensions and for reopening a closed plant.

Words worth knowing

Consejo de Seguridad Nuclear (Nuclear Safety Council)
Public body that oversees the safety of nuclear facilities in Spain.
ENRESA
Public company that manages radioactive waste and the dismantling of nuclear plants.
PNIEC
National Integrated Energy and Climate Plan: the Government's roadmap to meet energy and climate targets.
Neutralidad tecnológica (technological neutrality)
The principle that no energy source is favored over another; all compete on equal terms.
Proposición de ley (bill)
A text through which a parliamentary group proposes a law. It is not an approved law until it goes through Congress and is voted on.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced4 April 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted8 April 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments27 June 2025Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2025Sept 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026Sept 202611. 4 April 2025: Presentación22. 8 April 2025: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 08/04/2025 hasta 11/04/202533. 8 April 2025: Calificación44. 11 April 2025: Gobierno Contestación desde 11/04/2025 hasta 24/05/202555. 24 May 2025: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 24/05/2025 hasta 17/06/202566. 17 June 2025: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 17/06/2025 hasta 24/06/202577. 24 June 2025: Comisión de Transición Ecológica y Reto Demográfico Publicación desde 24/06/2025 hasta 27/06/202588. 27 June 2025: Comisión de Transición Ecológica y Reto Demográfico Enmiendas desde 27/06/2025 hasta 06/10/202699. 6 October 2026: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 06/10/2026 hasta 04/11/2026

17 June 2025

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 171 yes · 166 no · 7 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, to guarantee the contribution of nuclear energy in the decarbonization of the energy system.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 119· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 32 most voted in favour; in 10, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 32
  • Against: 10
  • Tie: 10
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR27
26 against · 1 did not vote
Republicano7
7 against
Socialista119
117 against · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
7 abst.
Mixto8
1 in favour · 5 against · 2 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
137 in favour
VOX33
33 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.