What it is
Bill to toughen penalties for forced marriage
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 17 February 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, the Penal Code, to strengthen the penalties for the crime of forced marriage.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000164· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would raise the prison sentence for anyone who forces another person to marry through serious intimidation or violence: it would go from 6 months to 3 years and 6 months to a sentence of 1 to 3 years and 6 months.
- Anyone who uses violence, serious intimidation or deception to make someone leave Spain or prevent their return, in order to force them into marriage, would receive the sentence in its upper half. If the victim is a minor, the penalty would be raised one degree.
- Convictions could include a declaration that the marriage is void or its dissolution, along with decisions on filiation and child support.
- The rule is issued under the State's exclusive power over criminal legislation and would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- People forced to marry through serious intimidation or violence: They would benefit from higher penalties for those who force them.
- Minors who are victims of forced marriage: The bill provides for aggravated penalties when the victim is a minor.
- People forced to leave Spain or barred from returning to make them marry: Whoever does this with violence, intimidation or deception would receive the sentence in its upper half.
Words worth knowing
- Proposición de ley
- A bill introduced by a parliamentary group so it can become law. It is not approved yet.
- Ley Orgánica
- A type of Spanish law reserved for major matters, such as criminal law, requiring a special vote in Congress.
- Pena superior en grado
- Raising the punishment one step above the maximum set for the offense.
- Nulidad del matrimonio
- A court ruling that the marriage was never valid from the start.
- Alimentos
- Money one person must pay for the support of another, for example a child.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced17 February 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted25 February 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
6 May 2025
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the VOX Parliamentary Group, Organic bill to amend Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, of the Penal Code, for the aggravation of penalties for the crime of forced marriage.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 107· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 25 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 14 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 30 most voted in favour; in 11, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 30
- Against: 11
- Tie: 11
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 26 against · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 118 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 8 | 1 in favour · 6 against · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 136 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 32 in favour · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000164
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 107
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.