What it is
Bill to make fueling drug boats a criminal offense
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 17 February 2025. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, the Penal Code, to criminalize the transport and storage of predetermined liquid fuels for drug trafficking.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000163· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill responds to the growth of drug trafficking and to the practice known as 'Petaqueo Fueling fast drug-carrying boats at sea, done by other vessels called 'guarderías'.': fueling fast drug-carrying boats at sea. Currently this conduct is only punished with an administrative fine, not as a crime.
- The bill would amend Article 568 of the Criminal Code to punish the possession, storage or transport of gasoline with manifest recklessness. Promoters and organizers would face four to eight years in prison, and those who cooperate, three to five.
- Manifest recklessness would be understood to exist when a single transport or a storage in one place exceeds the limit set by regulation.
- The Government could issue the rules needed to develop the law, which relies on the State's exclusive power over criminal legislation and would take effect the day after its publication in the Boletín Oficial del Estado.
Who it affects
- People who transport or store liquid fuel above the regulatory limits: Could face prison terms of three to eight years for transporting or storing fuel with manifest recklessness.
- State law enforcement agencies and the Public Prosecutor's Office: Would have a specific criminal offense to pursue 'petaqueo', without needing to prove the link to drug trafficking.
- The Government: Must set by regulation the fuel limits that determine manifest recklessness.
Words worth knowing
- Petaqueo
- Fueling fast drug-carrying boats at sea, done by other vessels called 'guarderías'.
- Narcolancha
- High-speed rigid or semi-rigid inflatable boat used by drug trafficking organizations.
- Temeridad manifiesta
- Manifest recklessness: awareness of the forbidden risk and intent to carry out the conduct; under the bill, presumed when the regulatory fuel limit is exceeded.
- Proposición de Ley Orgánica
- A bill submitted to the Congress of Deputies (Congreso de los Diputados) to amend an organic law; it is not yet an approved law.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced17 February 2025Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted25 February 2025The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
17 June 2025
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Organic Private member's bill by the VOX Parliamentary Group amending Organic Act 10/1995, of 23 November, the Penal Code, to criminally define the transport and storage of predetermined liquid fuels for drug trafficking.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 119· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 25 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 21 yes · 14 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 32 most voted in favour; in 10, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 32
- Against: 10
- Tie: 10
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 26 against · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 119 | 116 against · 3 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 8 | 1 in favour · 5 against · 2 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 in favour |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000163
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 119
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.