Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to strengthen living wills for end-of-life care

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 17 October 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's bill on the right to grant advance directives.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000133· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would recognize the right of every adult in Spain to state in advance, in writing, what care and treatment they want at the end of their life, and also to request the assistance in dying regulated by the euthanasia law.
  2. Living wills could be made in a public document or under the applicable rules, and in the second case they would need to be registered in the National Registry to be valid nationwide. They would have to appear in a visible place in the patient's medical record.
  3. Patients could appoint a representative to make sure their instructions are followed and, in situations not covered, to be guided by the values stated in the document. If the person keeps the capacity to decide at the end of life, their wishes at that moment prevail.
  4. The bill would amend Article 11 of Law 41/2002 to update the rules on living wills and change their current limits, removing the reference to good clinical practice that could reduce their effectiveness.

Who it affects

  • Adults who want to put in writing their wishes about care and treatment at the end of life.: They could make a living will in a public document or under the applicable rules, and change or revoke it at any time.
  • Patients in the end-of-life process.: If they keep the capacity to decide, their wishes at that moment prevail over any prior instructions.
  • Representatives appointed in living wills.: They must follow their assigned duties, seek the person's best interest, and ensure the instructions are carried out.
  • Health professionals and health centers, public and private.: They must keep living wills visible in the medical record and cannot ignore their existence.

Words worth knowing

Instrucciones previas (living will)
A document in which a person states in advance what care and treatment they want if they reach a point when they cannot express it themselves.
Lex artis
A Latin phrase referring to good clinical practice, that is, how health professionals normally act.
Historia clínica (medical record)
The document holding all of a patient's health information.
Prestación de ayuda para morir (assistance in dying)
The assistance regulated by the Spanish euthanasia law for people who request it under certain conditions.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced17 October 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted22 October 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Oct 2024Nov 202411. 17 October 2024: Presentación22. 22 October 2024: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 22/10/2024 hasta 25/10/202433. 22 October 2024: Calificación44. 25 October 2024: Gobierno Contestación desde 25/10/2024 hasta 02/12/202455. 2 December 2024: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 02/12/2024 hasta 10/12/202466. 10 December 2024: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 10/12/2024 hasta 16/12/2024

10 December 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 162 yes · 180 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill of the Socialist Parliamentary Group, on the right to grant advance directives.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 83· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista and Mixto. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 9 most voted in favour; in 30, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 9
  • Against: 30
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR27
26 in favour · 1 did not vote
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista120
118 in favour · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto8
5 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
134 against · 3 did not vote
VOX33
33 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.