What it is
Bill would require regions to take in unaccompanied migrant minors
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 15 July 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista Grupo Parlamentario Plurinacional SUMAR Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.
Official title: Private member's bill amending Organic Law 4/2000, of 11 January, on the rights and freedoms of foreigners in Spain and their social integration.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000123· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would declare an extraordinary migration contingency in the Canary Islands, Ceuta and Melilla when the minor protection system is over 150% of its available places. In that case, the State would decide which autonomous community each minor is moved to.
- It would create a management model for these emergencies, agreed at the Sectoral Conference on Children and Adolescents, with objective criteria to distribute minors and regulate their referral to other autonomous communities.
- The response plan sets specific deadlines: the minor would be registered in the Register of Unaccompanied Foreign Minors within 24 hours of being processed, and the transfer to the destination community would take place within a maximum of 15 calendar days, with the minor being heard and the Public Prosecutor involved.
- The plan's application criteria would be binding on all autonomous communities. A repeated and unjustified refusal to comply could be considered a very serious offense with disciplinary liability.
- Entities and people who regularly work caring for these minors would have to report the location of unaccompanied foreign minors to the authorities. Failing to do so would be a punishable offense.
- The plan's application criteria must be approved within three months of the law taking effect, and minors already in the Canary Islands, Ceuta and Melilla would have to be relocated within a maximum of one year.
Who it affects
- Unaccompanied foreign minors in the Canary Islands, Ceuta and Melilla: They could be moved to another autonomous community, where they would come under the guardianship of its child protection services.
- Autonomous communities and autonomous cities: They would have to take in the minors assigned to them and comply with the binding plan criteria.
- Entities and people caring for these minors: They would have to report the location of unaccompanied minors to the authorities.
- Public Prosecutor (Ministerio Fiscal): Would take part in transfer proceedings and could act on their own initiative at any stage.
Words worth knowing
- Menor extranjero no acompañado
- A minor who arrives in Spain without their parents or a responsible adult.
- Tutela
- Legal care and representation of a minor, assumed by the public administration when the minor is in a situation of neglect.
- Contingencia migratoria extraordinaria
- A migration situation so intense that it exceeds a territory's normal reception capacity.
- Conferencia Sectorial de Infancia y Adolescencia
- A body where the State and the autonomous communities meet to agree on children's affairs.
- Proposición de ley
- A bill tabled by parliamentary groups, which still must be debated and passed by the Congress.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced15 July 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted17 July 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
23 July 2024
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist, Plurinational SUMAR, and Mixed Parliamentary Groups, amending Organic Law 4/2000, of January 11, on the rights and freedoms of foreigners in Spain and their social integration.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 63 of sitting 56· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 22 yes · 10 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 15 yes · 21 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 7 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Mixto. Against, most of Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 30, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 30
- Tie: 11
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 27 in favour |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 8 | 7 in favour · 1 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 against |
| VOX | 33 | 33 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000123
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 13 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 63 of sitting 56
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.