What it is
Bill would change how top judges and prosecutors are appointed
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 26 June 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's Organic bill reforming Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary and reforming Law 50/1981, of 30 December, regulating the Organic Statute of the Public Prosecutor's Office.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000118· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would require 20 years of judicial career to become a Supreme Court judge, instead of the 10 the current rule requires for most seats.
- Judges who run as candidates for representative public office or accept political or trusted positions would move to voluntary leave status. If they take the position, they could not return to active service until two years after leaving it, and during that time they would be assigned to the Supreme Court or the regional High Court without losing pay.
- To become a member of the governing council of judges (Consejo General del Poder Judicial The body that governs judges in Spain, for example by appointing them to judicial positions.) through the jurist slot, candidates could not have been a minister, state secretary, regional minister, local council president, or a member of parliament in the previous five years. Candidates would have to appear before the appointing committee of the chamber with a record of merits and goals, and one substitute would be elected for each full member.
- A Qualification Commission would be created within the judges' governing council, with five members, to review appointments that fall to the full council. A three-fifths majority would also be required to appoint presidents of provincial courts and the Supreme Court judge who oversees the activities of the National Intelligence Center.
- The State Attorney General (Fiscal General del Estado The head of the public prosecution service in Spain.) would have to step aside from cases when the grounds for disqualification that apply to judges affect him, with the decision made by the chamber board of prosecutors chaired by the Lieutenant Prosecutor of the Supreme Court. The bill would also bar proposing as Attorney General anyone who in the previous five years was a minister, state secretary, regional minister, local council president, or a member of parliament.
- Within six months of the law taking effect, the judges' governing council would have to produce a study on European systems for electing council members and a reform proposal approved by three fifths, to be sent to the Government, the Congress and the Senate.
Who it affects
- Judges and magistrates: New rules on leave and returning to service if they take political positions or run for office, and stricter requirements to join the Supreme Court.
- Jurists of recognized competence: New disqualifications and a public appearance to become members of the judges' governing council.
- Consejo General del Poder Judicial: New Qualification Commission, substitutes for members, and three-fifths majorities for certain appointments.
- State Attorney General: New grounds for stepping aside and new disqualifications for the position.
Words worth knowing
- Consejo General del Poder Judicial
- The body that governs judges in Spain, for example by appointing them to judicial positions.
- Excedencia voluntaria
- A status in which a judge temporarily stops working as a judge but keeps some rights.
- Vocal
- Each member of the Consejo General del Poder Judicial.
- Fiscal General del Estado
- The head of the public prosecution service in Spain.
- Mayoría de tres quintos
- A requirement that at least 3 out of 5 members vote in favor, a higher majority than usual.
It summarizes the text passed by the full Congreso. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced26 June 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted2 July 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments5 July 2024Groups propose changes.
- Committee9 July 2024A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary17 July 2024All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate23 July 2024The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE31 July 2024It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 15 official steps on a timeline
23 July 2024
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Overall vote on the Organic Private member's bill reforming Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, and reforming Law 50/1981, of December 30, regulating the Organic Statute of the Prosecutor's Office, due to its organic nature.
This law had 5 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 65 of sitting 56· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 9 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 18 yes · 5 no · 5 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Girona Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 6 yes · 2 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 25 yes · 6 no · 5 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 8 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 7 yes · 3 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 9 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 11 yes · 2 no · 3 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Junts per Catalunya, Mixto and VOX. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 50 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 50
- Against: 0
- Tie: 2
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 did not vote |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 27 abst. |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 did not vote |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 1 in favour · 4 abst. |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 8 | 2 in favour · 4 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 in favour |
| VOX | 33 | 32 against · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000118
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 13 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 65 of sitting 56
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.