Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would change how top judges and prosecutors are appointed

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 26 June 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's Organic bill reforming Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary and reforming Law 50/1981, of 30 December, regulating the Organic Statute of the Public Prosecutor's Office.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000118· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would require 20 years of judicial career to become a Supreme Court judge, instead of the 10 the current rule requires for most seats.
  2. Judges who run as candidates for representative public office or accept political or trusted positions would move to voluntary leave status. If they take the position, they could not return to active service until two years after leaving it, and during that time they would be assigned to the Supreme Court or the regional High Court without losing pay.
  3. To become a member of the governing council of judges (Consejo General del Poder Judicial The body that governs judges in Spain, for example by appointing them to judicial positions.) through the jurist slot, candidates could not have been a minister, state secretary, regional minister, local council president, or a member of parliament in the previous five years. Candidates would have to appear before the appointing committee of the chamber with a record of merits and goals, and one substitute would be elected for each full member.
  4. A Qualification Commission would be created within the judges' governing council, with five members, to review appointments that fall to the full council. A three-fifths majority would also be required to appoint presidents of provincial courts and the Supreme Court judge who oversees the activities of the National Intelligence Center.
  5. The State Attorney General (Fiscal General del Estado The head of the public prosecution service in Spain.) would have to step aside from cases when the grounds for disqualification that apply to judges affect him, with the decision made by the chamber board of prosecutors chaired by the Lieutenant Prosecutor of the Supreme Court. The bill would also bar proposing as Attorney General anyone who in the previous five years was a minister, state secretary, regional minister, local council president, or a member of parliament.
  6. Within six months of the law taking effect, the judges' governing council would have to produce a study on European systems for electing council members and a reform proposal approved by three fifths, to be sent to the Government, the Congress and the Senate.

Who it affects

  • Judges and magistrates: New rules on leave and returning to service if they take political positions or run for office, and stricter requirements to join the Supreme Court.
  • Jurists of recognized competence: New disqualifications and a public appearance to become members of the judges' governing council.
  • Consejo General del Poder Judicial: New Qualification Commission, substitutes for members, and three-fifths majorities for certain appointments.
  • State Attorney General: New grounds for stepping aside and new disqualifications for the position.

Words worth knowing

Consejo General del Poder Judicial
The body that governs judges in Spain, for example by appointing them to judicial positions.
Excedencia voluntaria
A status in which a judge temporarily stops working as a judge but keeps some rights.
Vocal
Each member of the Consejo General del Poder Judicial.
Fiscal General del Estado
The head of the public prosecution service in Spain.
Mayoría de tres quintos
A requirement that at least 3 out of 5 members vote in favor, a higher majority than usual.

It summarizes the text passed by the full Congreso. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced26 June 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted2 July 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments5 July 2024Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee9 July 2024A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary17 July 2024All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senate23 July 2024The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE31 July 2024It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 15 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2024Jul 2024Jul 2024Jul 2024Jul 202411. 26 June 2024: Presentación22. 2 July 2024: Gobierno Contestación desde 02/07/2024 hasta 02/07/202433. 2 July 2024: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 02/07/2024 hasta 02/07/202444. 2 July 2024: Calificación55. 2 July 2024: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 02/07/2024 hasta 04/07/202466. 4 July 2024: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 04/07/2024 hasta 05/07/202477. 4 July 2024: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 04/07/2024 hasta 04/07/202488. 5 July 2024: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 05/07/2024 hasta 09/07/202499. 9 July 2024: Comisión de Justicia Mesa - Calificación desde 09/07/2024 hasta 09/07/20241010. 9 July 2024: Comisión de Justicia Debate de totalidad desde 09/07/2024 hasta 11/07/20241111. 11 July 2024: Comisión de Justicia Informe desde 11/07/2024 hasta 16/07/20241212. 16 July 2024: Comisión de Justicia Dictamen desde 16/07/2024 hasta 17/07/20241313. 17 July 2024: Pleno Aprobación desde 17/07/2024 hasta 23/07/20241414. 23 July 2024: Senado desde 23/07/2024 hasta 31/07/20241515. 31 July 2024: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 31/07/2024 hasta 10/09/2024

23 July 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 259 yes · 43 no · 32 abst.

Voted on: Overall vote on the Organic Private member's bill reforming Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judiciary, and reforming Law 50/1981, of December 30, regulating the Organic Statute of the Prosecutor's Office, due to its organic nature.

This law had 5 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 65 of sitting 56· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Junts per Catalunya, Mixto and VOX. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 50 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 50
  • Against: 0
  • Tie: 2
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 did not vote
Plurinacional SUMAR27
27 abst.
Republicano7
7 did not vote
Socialista120
119 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
1 in favour · 4 abst.
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto8
2 in favour · 4 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
137 in favour
VOX33
32 against · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.