What it is
Bill would require Congress approval for military aid abroad
Amendments step 3 of 7· LapsedIt is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 25 June 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Organic Private member's bill regarding the reform of Organic Law 5/2005, of November 17, on National Defense, for the sending of military aid abroad.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000116· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill proposes reforming the National Defense Law so that Congress plays a bigger role in decisions on military missions abroad and shipments of military material to war zones.
- Foreign operations would need Congress authorization, valid for five years. Before that period ends, the Government would have to review the mission before the Defense Committee and request an extension of up to five years, renewable.
- To send military material to a war zone, the Government would have to ask the full Congress for authorization each year. It would also have to set the maximum number of troops for each mission, and increases would be approved by the Defense Committee.
- Once the reform takes effect, the Government would have one year to request renewal of current missions and three months to request full Congress authorization for military material shipments already committed. If it does not, they would be considered finished.
Who it affects
- The Government, which would need Congress authorization for foreign missions and shipments of military material to war zones.: It would have to appear before the Defense Committee, set troop limits and renew authorizations for current missions within the set deadlines.
- The Congress of Deputies (Congreso de los Diputados), which would gain more power over military action abroad.: It would authorize operations and material shipments, approve troop increases and receive annual reports from the Defense Minister.
- The Armed Forces, whose foreign missions would be subject to these new parliamentary controls.: Their current missions would have to be renewed within one year or they would be considered finished.
Words worth knowing
- Proposición de Ley Orgánica
- A bill to amend an 'organic law', a special type of Spanish law that requires an absolute majority in Congress. It is still being processed, not an approved law.
- Comisión de Defensa
- A smaller group of members of Parliament that handles defense matters in Congress.
- Pleno del Congreso
- A meeting of all members of the Congress of Deputies to make decisions.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is lapsed.
- Introduced25 June 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted2 July 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments31 October 2024Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
22 October 2024
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress of Deputies, Organic Law regarding the reform of Organic Law 5/2005, of November 17, on National Defense, for the sending of military aid abroad.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 69· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 20 no · 5 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 6 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 21 yes · 9 no · 5 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 7 yes · 3 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla Tie 5 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 4 no · 4 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Junts per Catalunya. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 35 most voted in favour; in 8, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 35
- Against: 8
- Tie: 9
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 27 abst. |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 against · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 8 | 5 in favour · 3 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 136 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000116
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 69
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.