Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to bar terrorism convicts from running as candidates

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 31 May 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 5/1985, of June 19, on the General Electoral Regime, relating to causes of ineligibility.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000110· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill adds a new ground of ineligibility: people who have served a sentence for terrorism-related crimes must document, when the candidacy is filed, their rejection of terrorism, their repentance, their apology to victims and their commitment to cooperate with the Justice system. They must also prove they have paid all civil liability and served all accessory penalties.
  2. Article 46 would also be amended to require these documents to be filed with the candidacy. After the candidacies are published, the Government must check that no candidate falls under the ineligibility grounds and, if so, immediately notify the competent Electoral Board.
  3. The explanatory statement justifies the reform by the return of terrorism convicts to electoral lists, especially in 2023, and cites Supreme Court and Constitutional Court rulings on banning parties and candidacies that succeed outlawed parties.
  4. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette. This is a bill introduced by the Popular Party group in the Congress of Deputies (Congreso de los Diputados), admitted for processing, not an approved law.

Who it affects

  • People convicted of terrorism-related crimes who have served their sentence and want to run as candidates: They must document rejection of terrorism, repentance, an apology to victims, cooperation with the Justice system, payment of civil liability and service of accessory penalties; otherwise they are ineligible.
  • Parties, federations and coalitions filing candidacies: They must submit the documents proving these candidates' eligibility along with the candidacy.
  • The Government: After candidacies are published, it must check that no candidate falls under the ineligibility grounds and notify the Electoral Board.
  • The Electoral Boards: They receive the Government's immediate notice about affected candidates.

Words worth knowing

Inelegible (inelegibilidad)
A person who cannot be elected to a representative public office.
Sentencia firme
A court ruling that can no longer be appealed.
Responsabilidad civil
Money the convicted person must pay as compensation for the harm caused.
Penas accesorias
Penalties added to the main sentence, such as disqualification from office or from the right to be elected.
Junta Electoral
The body that oversees the legality of electoral processes.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced31 May 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted5 June 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
May 2024Jun 2024Jul 2024Aug 2024Sept 202411. 31 May 2024: Presentación22. 5 June 2024: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 05/06/2024 hasta 07/06/202433. 5 June 2024: Calificación44. 7 June 2024: Gobierno Contestación desde 07/06/2024 hasta 14/09/202455. 14 September 2024: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 14/09/2024 hasta 15/10/202466. 15 October 2024: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 15/10/2024 hasta 21/10/2024

15 October 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 169 yes · 174 no

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress of Deputies, Organic bill amending Organic Law 5/1985, of June 19, on the General Electoral Regime, regarding the causes of ineligibility.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 67· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 30 most voted in favour; in 11, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 30
  • Against: 11
  • Tie: 11
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR27
26 against · 1 did not vote
Republicano7
7 against
Socialista120
119 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 against · 1 did not vote
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto8
1 in favour · 5 against · 2 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
135 in favour · 2 did not vote
VOX33
33 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.