What it is
Proposal to stop cutting pensions for retirement with 40 years of contributions
Amendments step 3 of 7· LapsedIt is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 23 May 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.
Official title: Private member's bill on retirement without penalty.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000105· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would remove the reduction coefficients (pension cuts) for people who retire with 40 years of contributions, even if they retire early. It argues that today some people with long contribution records get less pension than others with fewer years.
- The text says these cuts hit hardest among long-term unemployed people over 52, a group with high rates of long-term unemployment.
- People already retired with 40 or more years of contributions could ask the INSS to recalculate their pension under the new rules. If the recalculation raises the pension, the increase would apply from the date of the request.
- The rule would take effect on the day it is published in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).
Who it affects
- People with 40 years of contributions: Could retire early without a pension cut if they prove 40 years of contributions.
- People already retired with 40 or more years of contributions: Would benefit from the new no-penalty rule and could request a pension recalculation.
- Long-term unemployed people over 52: The group that, according to the text, suffers most under the current reduction coefficients.
Words worth knowing
- Coeficiente reductor (reduction coefficient)
- A percentage subtracted from the pension when someone retires before the legal retirement age.
- Jubilación anticipada (early retirement)
- Retiring before the legal retirement age while meeting certain requirements.
- INSS
- National Social Security Institute, the public agency that manages pensions.
- Proposición de ley (bill)
- A text in the form of a law introduced by members of parliament. It is not a law until approved.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is lapsed.
- Introduced23 May 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted28 May 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments2 October 2026Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
22 September 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Parliamentary Group Mixed, on retirement without penalty.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 199· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no · 5 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Badajoz More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 25 yes · 2 no · 5 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cádiz More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Ceuta Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- León More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Madrid More votes in favour 16 yes · 5 no · 15 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 5 abst.
- Melilla Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Murcia More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 4 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Palencia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.
- Soria More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 2 no · 6 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. Against, most of VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 16 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 16
- Against: 0
- Abstained: 15
- Tie: 21
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 26 in favour |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Socialista | 121 | 121 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 6 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 9 | 8 in favour · 1 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 136 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 32 | 32 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000105
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 199
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.