Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to stop cutting pensions for retirement with 40 years of contributions

Amendments step 3 of 7· Lapsed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 23 May 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Official title: Private member's bill on retirement without penalty.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000105· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would remove the reduction coefficients (pension cuts) for people who retire with 40 years of contributions, even if they retire early. It argues that today some people with long contribution records get less pension than others with fewer years.
  2. The text says these cuts hit hardest among long-term unemployed people over 52, a group with high rates of long-term unemployment.
  3. People already retired with 40 or more years of contributions could ask the INSS to recalculate their pension under the new rules. If the recalculation raises the pension, the increase would apply from the date of the request.
  4. The rule would take effect on the day it is published in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • People with 40 years of contributions: Could retire early without a pension cut if they prove 40 years of contributions.
  • People already retired with 40 or more years of contributions: Would benefit from the new no-penalty rule and could request a pension recalculation.
  • Long-term unemployed people over 52: The group that, according to the text, suffers most under the current reduction coefficients.

Words worth knowing

Coeficiente reductor (reduction coefficient)
A percentage subtracted from the pension when someone retires before the legal retirement age.
Jubilación anticipada (early retirement)
Retiring before the legal retirement age while meeting certain requirements.
INSS
National Social Security Institute, the public agency that manages pensions.
Proposición de ley (bill)
A text in the form of a law introduced by members of parliament. It is not a law until approved.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is lapsed.

  1. Introduced23 May 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted28 May 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments2 October 2026Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2024Sept 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 2025Sept 2025Dec 2025Mar 2026Jun 2026Sept 202611. 23 May 2024: Presentación22. 28 May 2024: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 28/05/2024 hasta 31/05/202433. 28 May 2024: Calificación44. 31 May 2024: Gobierno Contestación desde 31/05/2024 hasta 07/09/202455. 7 September 2024: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 07/09/2024 hasta 22/09/202666. 22 September 2026: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 22/09/2026 hasta 29/09/202677. 29 September 2026: Comisión de Trabajo, Eco. Social, Inclusión, S.Social y Migraciones Publicación desde 29/09/2026 hasta 02/10/202688. 2 October 2026: Comisión de Trabajo, Eco. Social, Inclusión, S.Social y Migraciones Enmiendas desde 02/10/2026 hasta 06/10/202699. 6 October 2026: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 06/10/2026 hasta 04/11/2026

22 September 2026

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 178 yes · 33 no · 136 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Parliamentary Group Mixed, on retirement without penalty.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 199· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. Against, most of VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 16 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 16
  • Against: 0
  • Abstained: 15
  • Tie: 21
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR26
26 in favour
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista121
121 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
4 in favour · 1 did not vote
Junts per Catalunya7
6 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto9
8 in favour · 1 against
Popular en el Congreso137
136 abst. · 1 did not vote
VOX32
32 against

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.