Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill proposes a state office to prevent corruption

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 4 April 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Plurinacional SUMAR.

Official title: Private member's bill for the creation of the Office for the Prevention of Corruption.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000086· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would create the Office for the Prevention of Corruption as a public entity with its own legal personality and independence, in charge of preventing, detecting, investigating and eradicating corruption and fraud involving public funds.
  2. The Office would have five functions: awareness raising, prevention, investigation, evaluation and protection of whistleblowers. Its staff could enter public offices, conduct interviews and request banking information.
  3. State administrations and entities would have to set up an internal corruption prevention system, with early warnings and their own plan, within one year of the law taking effect. Not having one would be a punishable offense.
  4. Investigations would have to be opened or dismissed within two months of a complaint and could not last more than six months, extendable by another six in complex cases. If evidence of a crime appears, the case would go to the Public Prosecutor's Office or the judge.
  5. The Office's director would be elected by the Congress of Deputies (Congreso de los Diputados) by a three-fifths majority, for a five-year non-renewable term, and must be someone with no party or union affiliation and more than ten years of experience.
  6. Offenses would be classified as minor, serious or very serious, with fines from €500 up to €1,000,000 depending on the case, plus possible bans on contracting with the public sector or receiving public subsidies.

Who it affects

  • The Government, the state administration and its public sector entities, which would have to create internal prevention systems and cooperate with the Office.: required to create prevention systems and cooperate
  • Anyone receiving public aid, subsidies or contracts, including political parties, unions and companies, who could be investigated and sanctioned.: subject to investigation and sanctions
  • Public officials and employees, who would have to report fraudulent practices they become aware of.: duty to report irregularities
  • Any person, who could file complaints through the Office's mailbox and request that their identity be kept secret.: can report confidentially

Words worth knowing

Entidad de derecho público
A public entity with its own legal personality, meaning it can act on its own with its own rights and obligations.
Potestad sancionadora
The power of a public body to impose sanctions, such as fines, when the law is broken.
Prescripción
The maximum time limit for punishing an offense or enforcing a sanction; once it passes, no action can be taken.
Comisión de servicio
A temporary assignment of a civil servant to a position other than their usual one.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced4 April 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted9 April 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Jun 2024Sept 2024Dec 2024Mar 2025Jun 202511. 4 April 2024: Presentación22. 9 April 2024: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 09/04/2024 hasta 12/04/202433. 9 April 2024: Calificación44. 12 April 2024: Gobierno Contestación desde 12/04/2024 hasta 22/05/202455. 22 May 2024: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 22/05/2024 hasta 16/09/202566. 16 September 2025: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 16/09/2025 hasta 22/09/2025

16 September 2025

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 170 yes · 176 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Plurinational SUMAR Parliamentary Group, for the creation of the Office for the Prevention of Corruption.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 131· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Mixto. Against, most of Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 30, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 11
  • Against: 30
  • Tie: 11
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR26
26 in favour
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista120
118 in favour · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto9
8 in favour · 1 abst.
Popular en el Congreso137
136 against · 1 did not vote
VOX33
33 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.