Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to double the bank tax and fund public housing

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 16 February 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Official title: Private member's bill for the correct imposition of the benefits fallen from the sky of the big banks.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000055· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would double the temporary bank levy in Law 38/2022, raising it from 4.8% to 10% on interest and commission margins, for the years 2023, 2024 and 2025.
  2. It would also create a 75% tax on interest and commission margins that exceed by more than 5% those of the first half of 2022, applying in 2024 and 2025.
  3. The money raised would go to a fund managed by the Ministry of Transport to lend to local governments for building public social rental housing in tight housing markets, for vulnerable people on the waiting list for official protected housing.
  4. Banks could not pass the cost of the tax on to their customers: doing so would be a very serious offense fined at 150% of the amount passed on.

Words worth knowing

Gravamen temporal
A mandatory payment that applies only for a limited time, here to large banks.
Prestación patrimonial de carácter público no tributario
A mandatory payment to the State that, legally, does not technically count as a tax.
Vivienda de protección oficial
Public housing for rent or purchase at protected prices, for people with fewer resources.
Zonas tensionadas
Areas where rents have risen sharply and access to housing is difficult.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced16 February 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted20 February 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Feb 2024Mar 202411. 16 February 2024: Presentación22. 20 February 2024: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 20/02/2024 hasta 23/02/202433. 20 February 2024: Calificación44. 23 February 2024: Gobierno Contestación desde 23/02/2024 hasta 03/04/202455. 3 April 2024: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 03/04/2024 hasta 09/04/202466. 9 April 2024: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 09/04/2024 hasta 15/04/2024

9 April 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 41 yes · 294 no · 7 abst.

Voted on: Private Member's Bill by the Mixed Parliamentary Group, for the correct taxation of windfall profits of the big banks.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 34· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano and Mixto. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 51, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 51
  • Tie: 1
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
5 in favour · 1 did not vote
Plurinacional SUMAR27
25 in favour · 2 did not vote
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista119
118 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
7 abst.
Mixto8
4 in favour · 3 against · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
135 against · 2 did not vote
VOX33
33 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.