Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to let judges choose their own governing council members

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 30 November 2023. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, for the reform of the procedure for the election of the members of the General Council of the Judiciary.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000024· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill, introduced by the VOX parliamentary group, would change how members of the General Council of the Judiciary (Consejo General del Poder Judicial) are chosen. It proposes that the twelve members drawn from the judiciary be elected by judges themselves, not by Congress and the Senate.
  2. Those twelve members would be elected by personal, equal, direct and secret vote, in a single district covering the whole country. The election would have to be called three months before the Council's term ends.
  3. New grounds for ineligibility would be added: candidates could not include anyone who was on an electoral list in the previous four years, anyone who served in Congress, the Senate, regional assemblies, local councils or the European Parliament in the previous term, or anyone who held a senior public office in the previous four years.
  4. Members of the outgoing Council, staff of the Council's technical bodies, and members of the Electoral Board could not run either, with some exceptions. Outgoing Council members could not be reappointed in any case.
  5. An Electoral Board made up of Supreme Court judges would be created to call and organize the elections, count the votes and announce the results. Its decisions could be appealed to the Supreme Court.
  6. Article 570 bis, which regulated the Council's regime when it serves in a caretaker capacity, would be repealed. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.

Who it affects

  • Active judges and magistrates: They would elect the twelve judicial members of the Council and could run as candidates if they meet the requirements.
  • Congress of Deputies and Senate: They would no longer choose the twelve judicial members; they would keep appointing the four jurist members assigned to each chamber, by a three-fifths majority.
  • Lawyers and other legal professionals: They would remain the pool for the eight members proposed by the chambers, requiring more than fifteen years of professional practice.
  • People linked to politics or senior public office: They could not run for the Council during the periods set out in the bill.

Words worth knowing

Consejo General del Poder Judicial (CGPJ)
The governing body of the Spanish judiciary: it handles appointments, promotions, inspections and discipline for judges.
Ley orgánica (organic law)
A type of Spanish law reserved for especially important matters, such as the organization of the judiciary, requiring a special majority to pass.
Vocales (council members)
Each of the twenty members who sit on the General Council of the Judiciary.
Junta Electoral (Electoral Board)
The body in charge of calling, organizing and overseeing the elections and announcing the results.
Circunscripción electoral (electoral district)
The territory within which candidates are elected; here it would be a single district for all of Spain.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced30 November 2023Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted5 December 2023The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Nov 2023Dec 2023Jan 202411. 30 November 2023: Presentación22. 5 December 2023: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 05/12/2023 hasta 11/12/202333. 5 December 2023: Calificación44. 11 December 2023: Gobierno Contestación desde 11/12/2023 hasta 17/02/202455. 17 February 2024: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 17/02/2024 hasta 27/02/202466. 27 February 2024: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 27/02/2024 hasta 04/03/2024

27 February 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 170 yes · 176 no

Voted on: Private member's bill of the VOX Parliamentary Group, Organic by which Organic Law 6/1985, of July 1, on the Judicial Power, is amended for the reform of the procedure for the election of the members of the General Council of the Judicial Power.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 24· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 31 most voted in favour; in 11, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 31
  • Against: 11
  • Tie: 10
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 against
Plurinacional SUMAR27
27 against
Republicano7
7 against
Socialista120
118 against · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto8
1 in favour · 6 against · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
136 in favour · 1 did not vote
VOX33
33 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.