What it is
Bill proposes time limits for official state secrets
Amendments step 3 of 7· LapsedIt is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 29 August 2023. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).
Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 9/1968, of April 5, on official secrets.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000005· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would require setting a time limit when classifying information: at most 25 years for secret matters and 10 years for reserved ones. Only for secret matters could the Council of Ministers grant an exceptional, reasoned extension of up to 10 more years.
- The power to classify information and to cancel its classification would rest exclusively with the Council of Ministers (Consejo de Ministros). When the time limit ends, the information would be declassified automatically unless the Council decides otherwise earlier.
- The Congress of Deputies and the Senate would always have access to any classified information they request, with the procedure set by their own rules. The law would no longer say whether those sessions must be secret, since that is a matter for each chamber's rules.
- A transitional provision would cover information classified before the law takes effect: items that have already met the time limit would be declassified, and the rest would be declassified when their limits are reached.
Who it affects
- The Government (Council of Ministers): It would be the only body able to classify and declassify information, and could exceptionally extend the time limit for secret matters with a reasoned decision.
- The Congress of Deputies and the Senate: They would always have access to classified information they request, under their own rules, and access in a non-secret session would declassify the information.
- The media and private individuals: They would be notified when information is classified if it may come to their knowledge, with the duty of cooperation set by the law.
Words worth knowing
- Materia clasificada (classified matter)
- Official information that cannot be freely accessed because it is considered secret or reserved for state security reasons.
- Consejo de Ministros (Council of Ministers)
- The body made up of the prime minister and the ministers, which makes the Government's main decisions.
- Recurso contencioso-administrativo (judicial review claim)
- A claim brought before the courts to review a decision by the public administration.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is lapsed.
- Introduced29 August 2023Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted5 September 2023The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments8 March 2024Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
27 February 2024
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the Basque Parliamentary Group (EAJ-PNV), on the reform of Law 9/1968, of April 5, on official secrets.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 24· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 25 yes · 7 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 15 yes · 20 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 7 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 7 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza Tie 3 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 30, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 30
- Tie: 11
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 27 in favour |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 118 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Mixto | 8 | 6 in favour · 1 against · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 135 against · 2 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 33 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000005
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 24
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.