Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to strengthen political and judicial oversight of Spain's intelligence agency

Amendments step 3 of 7· Lapsed

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 29 August 2023. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).

Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 11/2002, of May 6, regulating the National Intelligence Center; and Organic Law 2/2002, of May 6, regulating the prior judicial control of the National Intelligence Center.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000002· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would have the person holding the Presidency of the Government propose the appointment of the CNI's secretary of state director, creating direct political responsibility.
  2. It would allow the Congress committee that oversees the CNI, the Commission for the Control of Funds Allocated to Reserved Expenses, to learn which means were used in intelligence operations that already have judicial authorization.
  3. It would have judicial authorization for CNI activities affecting the home and the secrecy of communications granted unanimously, through a reasoned decision, by a panel of three Supreme Court justices instead of a single judge.
  4. It would require the authorization request to specify the means and resources to be used, detailing their features, so they can be weighed under the principle of proportionality.
  5. It would require the CNI director to inform the justices of how each authorization or extension was carried out once it ends, as a form of after-the-fact oversight.
  6. It would have the relevant justices appointed for five years, on the proposal of the General Council of the Judiciary, from among Supreme Court justices with at least three years of service, and the law would take effect the day it is published in the official state gazette.

Words worth knowing

CNI
Centro Nacional de Inteligencia, Spain's intelligence agency.
Proposición de ley
A bill introduced by members of Congress. It is not yet an approved law.
Ley orgánica
Organic law, a stricter type of Spanish law reserved for key matters such as fundamental rights.
Resolución motivada
A written court decision that explains the reasons behind it.
Principio de proporcionalidad
The principle that measures must be limited to what is necessary for their purpose.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is lapsed.

  1. Introduced29 August 2023Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted5 September 2023The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments11 October 2024Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2023Dec 2024Dec 202511. 29 August 2023: Presentación22. 5 September 2023: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 05/09/2023 hasta 08/09/202333. 5 September 2023: Calificación44. 8 September 2023: Gobierno Contestación desde 08/09/2023 hasta 16/10/202355. 16 October 2023: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 16/10/2023 hasta 24/09/202466. 24 September 2024: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 24/09/2024 hasta 08/10/202477. 8 October 2024: Comisión de Defensa Publicación desde 08/10/2024 hasta 11/10/202488. 11 October 2024: Comisión de Defensa Enmiendas desde 11/10/2024 hasta 06/10/202699. 6 October 2026: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 06/10/2026 hasta 04/11/2026

24 September 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 177 yes · 170 no

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Basque Parliamentary Group (EAJ-PNV), amending Law 11/2002, of May 6, regulating the National Intelligence Center; and Organic Law 2/2002, of May 6, regulating the prior judicial control of the National Intelligence Center.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 61· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 30, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 11
  • Against: 30
  • Tie: 11
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR27
26 in favour · 1 did not vote
Republicano6
6 in favour
Socialista120
120 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Junts per Catalunya7
7 in favour
Mixto8
7 in favour · 1 against
Popular en el Congreso137
136 against · 1 did not vote
VOX33
33 against

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.