What it is
Bill to strengthen political and judicial oversight of Spain's intelligence agency
Amendments step 3 of 7· LapsedIt is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 29 August 2023. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).
Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 11/2002, of May 6, regulating the National Intelligence Center; and Organic Law 2/2002, of May 6, regulating the prior judicial control of the National Intelligence Center.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000002· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would have the person holding the Presidency of the Government propose the appointment of the CNI's secretary of state director, creating direct political responsibility.
- It would allow the Congress committee that oversees the CNI, the Commission for the Control of Funds Allocated to Reserved Expenses, to learn which means were used in intelligence operations that already have judicial authorization.
- It would have judicial authorization for CNI activities affecting the home and the secrecy of communications granted unanimously, through a reasoned decision, by a panel of three Supreme Court justices instead of a single judge.
- It would require the authorization request to specify the means and resources to be used, detailing their features, so they can be weighed under the principle of proportionality.
- It would require the CNI director to inform the justices of how each authorization or extension was carried out once it ends, as a form of after-the-fact oversight.
- It would have the relevant justices appointed for five years, on the proposal of the General Council of the Judiciary, from among Supreme Court justices with at least three years of service, and the law would take effect the day it is published in the official state gazette.
Words worth knowing
- CNI
- Centro Nacional de Inteligencia, Spain's intelligence agency.
- Proposición de ley
- A bill introduced by members of Congress. It is not yet an approved law.
- Ley orgánica
- Organic law, a stricter type of Spanish law reserved for key matters such as fundamental rights.
- Resolución motivada
- A written court decision that explains the reasons behind it.
- Principio de proporcionalidad
- The principle that measures must be limited to what is necessary for their purpose.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is lapsed.
- Introduced29 August 2023Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted5 September 2023The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments11 October 2024Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
24 September 2024
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Basque Parliamentary Group (EAJ-PNV), amending Law 11/2002, of May 6, regulating the National Intelligence Center; and Organic Law 2/2002, of May 6, regulating the prior judicial control of the National Intelligence Center.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 61· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 25 yes · 7 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 4 yes · 5 no
- Cantabria More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Madrid More votes against 15 yes · 20 no
- Málaga More votes against 4 yes · 7 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 4 yes · 6 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 30, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 30
- Tie: 11
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 26 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Mixto | 8 | 7 in favour · 1 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 136 against · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 33 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000002
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 61
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.