Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

The bill would recognize and punish vicarious violence against women

Committee step 4 of 7· Lapsed

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 17 July 2026. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Organic Government bill on measures regarding vicarious violence.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000106· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill defines vicarious violence as violence exercised against a woman's children, descendants or other loved ones to cause her pain or suffering, and recognizes it as a form of gender-based violence. It also identifies as victims the women themselves, their children and descendants, and minors under their guardianship or custody.
  2. The bill adds vicarious violence as an aggravating circumstance of the gender-based crime, allowing higher sentences when a loved one is harmed to make a woman suffer. It also creates a new penalty barring the convicted person from publishing or spreading messages, texts or images related to the crime, applicable only to serious crimes against life, integrity, freedom or sexual freedom.
  3. The bill reforms the Civil Code to provide for the removal of parental authority when there is a final conviction for a serious crime against the couple's children or against the offender's wife or partner. It also allows courts to grant sole parental authority to the non-abusive parent when there are founded signs of violence, limits shared custody if it could harm the children, and requires that minors be heard before custody and visitation decisions.
  4. The bill strengthens training for judges and prosecutors on vicarious violence and on gender, childhood, disability and intersectional perspectives, both at the Judicial School and in entrance exams and continuing education. Judges working in gender violence or family courts would receive mandatory, periodic specialized training.
  5. The bill adds a minor's exposure to vicarious violence as a risk indicator in child legal protection, brings parental authority cases under a special procedural framework, and requires that vicarious violence be included in the training of teachers, health personnel and social services staff.
  6. The bill allows the mother of a child killed through vicarious violence to change the deceased child's surnames, and those of other minor children, to break the nominal link with the aggressor. It also prevents anyone who kills a child or loved one of the person generating a benefit from receiving Social Security survivor benefits.

Who it affects

  • Women who are victims of gender-based violence: They would receive reinforced protection against vicarious violence, and their abusers could face higher sentences.
  • Children and teenagers: They would have a guaranteed right to be heard in court proceedings affecting them and greater protection against visitation with the aggressor.
  • Parents or partners convicted of serious crimes: They could lose parental authority, lose visitation rights, be barred from publishing content about the crime, and be denied survivor benefits.
  • Judges, prosecutors, teachers, and health and social services personnel: They would receive mandatory training on vicarious violence and on gender, childhood, disability and intersectional perspectives.
  • Adults with disabilities who need support: They would be recognized as possible victims of vicarious violence and would have the right to be heard in proceedings affecting them.

Words worth knowing

Violencia vicaria (vicarious violence)
Violence exercised against a woman's children or other loved ones to cause her harm or suffering.
Patria potestad (parental authority)
The set of rights and duties parents have over their minor children, such as caring for, educating and representing them.
Guarda y custodia (custody)
A court decision on who the minor children live with and who cares for them when parents separate.
Delito doloso (intentional crime)
A crime committed on purpose, with intent to do it.
Prestaciones de muerte y supervivencia (death and survivor benefits)
Social Security pensions paid to the relatives of a deceased person.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is lapsed.

  1. Introduced17 July 2026Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted23 July 2026The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments27 July 2026Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee21 September 2026A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
Jul 2026Aug 2026Sept 202611. 17 July 2026: Presentación22. 23 July 2026: Comisión de Igualdad Publicación desde 23/07/2026 hasta 27/07/202633. 23 July 2026: Calificación44. 27 July 2026: Comisión de Igualdad Enmiendas desde 27/07/2026 hasta 06/10/202655. 18 September 2026: Comisión de Igualdad Mesa - Calificación desde 18/09/2026 hasta 21/09/202666. 21 September 2026: Comisión de Igualdad Debate de totalidad desde 21/09/2026 hasta 30/09/202677. 6 October 2026: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 06/10/2026 hasta 04/11/2026

30 September 2026

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 34 yes · 312 no

Voted on: Vote on the amendment to the whole for return of the Private member's bill for an Organic Law on measures regarding vicarious violence, presented by the Parliamentary Group VOX.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 10 of sitting 202· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya, Mixto and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 52, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 52
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
5 against · 1 did not vote
Plurinacional SUMAR26
1 in favour · 24 against · 1 did not vote
Republicano7
7 against
Socialista121
120 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Junts per Catalunya7
6 against · 1 did not vote
Mixto9
1 in favour · 8 against
Popular en el Congreso137
137 against
VOX32
32 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.