Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

The bill would create the State Public Health Agency

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 1 February 2024. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Official title: Government bill creating the State Public Health Agency and amending Law 33/2011, of October 4, General Public Health Law.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000007· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would create the State Public Health Agency (AESAP), a body with its own legal personality and management autonomy, attached to the Ministry of Health.
  2. The Agency would monitor the population's health, assess health and environmental risks, coordinate emergency preparedness, inform the public and advise on health policies, working with the autonomous communities.
  3. The bill would require all public administrations, entities and individuals to provide the AESAP with the data needed to monitor health and assess risks. Personal data could only be used for the Agency's purposes and under data protection rules.
  4. The bill would amend the Public Health Law to add the 'One Health' principle, regulate preparedness and response plans against health threats, and give the Agency the Ministry of Health's technical functions in public health surveillance.
  5. The bill would set fees for evaluating biocides and pesticides, with reductions for small and medium-sized businesses (from 60% for microbusinesses to 10% for medium-sized ones in some cases). The AESAP would manage these fees.
  6. The Government would have to approve the Agency's Statute by royal decree within six months of the law taking effect. The law would enter into force the day after its publication in the official state gazette.

Who it affects

  • Ministry of Health and AESAP: The Ministry would transfer direct management of technical surveillance functions to the Agency.
  • Autonomous communities: They would have to provide health data to the Agency and cooperate on surveillance and emergencies, with representation on its Council.
  • Health centers and companies: They would be required to provide data relevant to population health.
  • Biocide and pesticide companies: They would pay fees for evaluations and authorizations, with reductions for small and medium-sized businesses.
  • The public: People would receive information on health risks and have a state body for surveillance and crisis response.

Words worth knowing

Agencia estatal (state agency)
A public body with its own legal personality and some management autonomy, created to carry out specific tasks.
Vigilancia en salud pública (public health surveillance)
Collecting and analyzing data on population health to detect problems and risks early.
Una sola salud (One Health)
An approach that sees human, animal and environmental health as connected and managed together.
Biocidas (biocides)
Products that kill or control harmful organisms, such as disinfectants or insecticides.
Real decreto (royal decree)
A rule approved by the Government, with lower rank than a law.

It summarizes the drafting committee report. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced1 February 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted6 February 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments9 February 2024Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee20 February 2024A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary13 March 2025All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2024Jun 2024Sept 2024Dec 202411. 1 February 2024: Presentación22. 6 February 2024: Comisión de Sanidad Publicación desde 06/02/2024 hasta 09/02/202433. 6 February 2024: Calificación44. 9 February 2024: Comisión de Sanidad Enmiendas desde 09/02/2024 hasta 19/09/202455. 20 February 2024: Comisión de Sanidad Mesa - Calificación desde 20/02/2024 hasta 20/02/202466. 20 February 2024: Comisión de Sanidad Debate de totalidad desde 20/02/2024 hasta 29/02/202477. 19 September 2024: Comisión de Sanidad Informe desde 19/09/2024 hasta 26/02/202588. 26 February 2025: Comisión de Sanidad Dictamen desde 26/02/2025 hasta 13/03/202599. 13 March 2025: Pleno Aprobación desde 13/03/2025 hasta 20/03/20251010. 20 March 2025: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 20/03/2025 hasta 26/03/2025

20 March 2025

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 167 yes · 176 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Vote on the report on the Government bill to create the State Agency for Public Health and to amend Law 33/2011, of October 4, General Public Health Law.

This law had 5 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 19 of sitting 101· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Mixto. Against, most of Junts per Catalunya, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 32, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 11
  • Against: 32
  • Tie: 9
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR27
26 in favour · 1 did not vote
Republicano7
6 in favour · 1 did not vote
Socialista120
119 in favour · 1 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Junts per Catalunya7
7 against
Mixto8
5 in favour · 2 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso137
135 against · 2 did not vote
VOX33
33 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.