Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Government bill adopting measures to address the economic and social consequences arising from the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as to mitigate the effects of the drought (originating from Royal Decree-Law 8/2023, of 27 December).

Committee step 4 of 7· Lapsed

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 10 January 2024. Introduced by: Gobierno.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000003· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is lapsed.

  1. Introduced10 January 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted16 January 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments19 January 2024Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee7 March 2024A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2024Dec 202511. 10 January 2024: Presentación22. 16 January 2024: Comisión de Hacienda y Función Pública Publicación desde 16/01/2024 hasta 19/01/202433. 16 January 2024: Calificación44. 19 January 2024: Comisión de Hacienda y Función Pública Enmiendas desde 19/01/2024 hasta 07/03/202455. 7 March 2024: Comisión de Hacienda y Función Pública Informe desde 07/03/2024 hasta 06/10/202666. 6 October 2026: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 06/10/2026 hasta 04/11/2026

21 March 2024

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 338 yes · 1 no

Voted on: Vote on the request for the Plenary of the Chamber to take over the deliberation and final vote on the Government Bill adopting measures to address the economic and social consequences arising from the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as to mitigate the effects of the drought (originating from Royal Decree-Law 8/2023, of December 27), submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 17 of sitting 33· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Junts per Catalunya, Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 52
  • Against: 0
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu6
6 in favour
Plurinacional SUMAR27
24 in favour · 1 against · 2 did not vote
Republicano7
7 in favour
Socialista120
119 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 did not vote
Junts per Catalunya7
6 in favour · 1 did not vote
Mixto8
8 in favour
Popular en el Congreso137
135 in favour · 2 did not vote
VOX33
33 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.