Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation for the Government to explain the measures it intends to adopt to grant full effectiveness to the procedure established through its embassies and consulates to facilitate the submission of applications for international protection.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a motion. It was introduced on 27 April 2023. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000212· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced27 April 2023Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted9 May 2023The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary9 May 2023All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE11 May 2023It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Apr 202311. 27 April 2023: Presentación22. 9 May 2023: Calificación33. 9 May 2023: Pleno desde 09/05/2023 hasta 11/05/202344. 11 May 2023: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 11/05/2023 hasta 18/05/2023

11 May 2023

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 286 yes · 1 no · 52 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Basque Parliamentary Group (EAJ-PNV), for the Government to explain the measures it intends to adopt to grant full effectiveness to the procedure established through its embassies and consulates to facilitate the submission of applications for international protection. Voted in the terms of the compromise amendment presented by the Socialist Parliamentary Group and the Basque Parliamentary Group (EAJ-PNV).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 67 of sitting 259· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 51 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 51
  • Against: 0
  • Abstained: 1
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
117 in favour · 1 against · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto11
8 in favour · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc33
30 in favour · 3 did not vote
GPlu12
11 in favour · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso87
87 in favour
VOX52
51 abst. · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.