Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the solution the Government will provide to the situation of legal fraud due to the abuse of temporariness of public employees both in the Canary Islands and in the rest of the State.

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

Type of initiative: . It was introduced on 23 June 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000088· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced23 June 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted20 July 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 2 official steps on a timeline
Jun 202111. 23 June 2021: Presentación22. 20 July 2021: Calificación

15 September 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 23 yes · 122 no · 194 abst.

Voted on: Item 8.

This law had 8 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 11 of sitting 116· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos and GPlu. Against, most of Socialista. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 0 most voted in favour; in 5, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 0
  • Against: 5
  • Abstained: 36
  • Tie: 11
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 abst.
Republicano13
13 abst.
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
5 abst. · 1 did not vote
Mixto10
5 in favour · 1 against · 2 abst. · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc35
34 abst. · 1 did not vote
GPlu12
8 in favour · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
86 abst. · 2 did not vote
VOX52
1 in favour · 1 against · 48 abst. · 2 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.