Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation for the Minister of the Interior to report on the assumption of political responsibilities for the succession of scandals, irregularities and condemnatory sentences affecting his Department.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 15 April 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000067· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced15 April 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted20 April 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary20 April 2021All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Apr 202111. 15 April 2021: Presentación22. 20 April 2021: Calificación33. 20 April 2021: Pleno desde 20/04/2021 hasta 22/04/202144. 22 April 2021: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 22/04/2021 hasta 28/04/2021

22 April 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 151 yes · 189 no · 3 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, for the Minister of the Interior to account for the assumption of political responsibilities for the succession of scandals, irregularities, and condemnatory sentences affecting his Department.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 94· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 7 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 17 most voted in favour; in 21, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 17
  • Against: 21
  • Tie: 14
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
4 against · 1 did not vote
Republicano13
13 against
Socialista120
119 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto10
4 in favour · 5 against · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
7 in favour · 2 did not vote
Gcup-ec-gc35
35 against
GPlu12
7 against · 3 abst. · 2 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
52 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.