What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the draft Order of the Ministry for Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge to include all Iberian wolf populations in the List of Species in Special Protection Regime after the recent decision adopted by the State Commission for Natural Heritage and Biodiversity with the rejection of the affected Autonomous Communities, as well as its serious repercussions for a very important part of the livestock sector in the territories north of the Duero.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 25 February 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000054· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced25 February 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted2 March 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary2 March 2021All 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 4 official steps on a timeline

11 March 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 143 yes · 166 no · 38 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation of the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Mr. Martínez Oblanca), on the draft Order of the Ministry for Ecological Transition and the Demographic Challenge to include all populations of the Iberian wolf in the List of Species under Special Protection Regime after the recent decision adopted by the State Commission for Natural Heritage and Biodiversity with the rejection of the affected Autonomous Communities, as well as its serious repercussions for a very important part of the livestock sector in the territories north of the Duero. Voted in the terms of the compromise amendment presented by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, the VOX Parliamentary Group and the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Mr. Martínez Oblanca).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 14 of sitting 82· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Socialista and Gcup-ec-gc. 7 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 16 most voted in favour; in 17, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 16
Against: 17
Abstained: 2
Tie: 17

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu	5	5 against
Republicano	13	13 abst.
Socialista	120	120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	6	6 abst.
Mixto	9	5 in favour · 2 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos	10	10 abst.
Gcup-ec-gc	35	35 against
GPlu	12	4 against · 8 abst.
Popular en el Congreso	88	87 in favour · 1 did not vote
VOX	52	51 in favour · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000054
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 14 of sitting 82
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 11 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error