Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation regarding the regulation of housing rental prices through a future law on the matter.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 29 October 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Mixto.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000040· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced29 October 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted3 November 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary3 November 2020All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Oct 202011. 29 October 2020: Presentación22. 3 November 2020: Calificación33. 3 November 2020: Pleno desde 03/11/2020 hasta 19/11/202044. 19 November 2020: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 19/11/2020 hasta 30/11/2020

19 November 2020

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 63 yes · 273 no · 6 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Ms. Vehí Cantenys), regarding the regulation of housing rental prices through a future law on the matter. Voted in the terms of the compromise amendment submitted by the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Ms. Vehí Cantenys), the Republican Parliamentary Group and the Confederal Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 202 of sitting 61· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Socialista, Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 4 most voted in favour; in 45, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 4
  • Against: 45
  • Tie: 3
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 abst.
Mixto9
2 in favour · 7 against
Ciudadanos10
10 against
Gcup-ec-gc35
35 in favour
GPlu12
8 in favour · 4 against
Popular en el Congreso88
81 against · 7 did not vote
VOX52
51 against · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.