Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation to assess the absence of measures launched by the Government to ensure the survival of businesses and jobs in the hospitality sector and other sectors related to tourism in Spain.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 1 October 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000027· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced1 October 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted6 October 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary6 October 2020All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
11. 1 October 2020: Presentación22. 6 October 2020: Calificación33. 6 October 2020: Pleno desde 06/10/2020 hasta 15/10/202044. 15 October 2020: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 15/10/2020 hasta 22/10/2020

15 October 2020

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 156 yes · 166 no · 26 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, to assess the absence of measures launched by the Government to ensure the survival of businesses and jobs in the hospitality sector and other sectors related to tourism in Spain. Voted on the terms of the transactional amendment submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, the VOX Parliamentary Group and the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 5 of sitting 50· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Socialista and Gcup-ec-gc. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 21 most voted in favour; in 17, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 21
  • Against: 17
  • Abstained: 2
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
13 abst.
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
5 abst. · 1 did not vote
Mixto9
6 in favour · 2 against · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos10
10 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc35
35 against
GPlu12
4 against · 8 abst.
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
52 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.