Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the situation of temporary enlisted and petty officers who have reached or will reach the age of forty-five during the current health, economic and social crisis.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 17 September 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000020· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced17 September 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted22 September 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary22 September 2020All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
Sept 202011. 17 September 2020: Presentación22. 22 September 2020: Calificación33. 22 September 2020: Pleno Contestación desde 22/09/2020 hasta 23/09/202044. 23 September 2020: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 23/09/2020 hasta 01/10/2020

23 September 2020

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 64 yes · 236 no · 45 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, on the situation of temporary enlisted and petty officers who have reached or will reach the age of forty-five during the current health, economic, and social crisis. Voted in the terms of the transactional amendment submitted by the VOX Parliamentary Group and the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 44· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Ciudadanos and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 1 most voted in favour; in 49, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 1
  • Against: 49
  • Tie: 2
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
13 against
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto9
3 in favour · 3 against · 3 abst.
Ciudadanos10
10 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc35
34 abst. · 1 did not vote
GPlu12
3 against · 8 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
86 against · 2 did not vote
VOX52
51 in favour · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.