What it is

Motion following an urgent interpellation on the serious crisis opened within the Civil Guard due to the recent dismissals occurred in said Corps, the general policy of dismissals and appointments carried out by the Minister of the Interior and, in general, the orders issued by the Government to the high command of the State Security Forces and Corps during this health crisis.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a motion. It was introduced on 4 June 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000009· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

Introduced4 June 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
Admitted9 June 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
Plenary9 June 2020All 350 deputies vote.
Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

See the 4 official steps on a timeline

15 October 2020

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 152 yes · 169 no · 27 abst.

Voted on: Motion following an urgent interpellation by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, on the serious crisis opened within the Civil Guard due to the recent dismissals in said Corps, the general policy of dismissals and appointments carried out by the Minister of the Interior and, in general, the orders issued by the Government to the high command of the State Security Forces and Corps during this health crisis.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 50· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted

More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Gcup-ec-gc. 7 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 19 most voted in favour; in 19, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 19
Against: 19
Abstained: 1
Tie: 13

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu	5	1 against · 4 abst.
Republicano	13	13 abst.
Socialista	120	120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	6	5 against · 1 did not vote
Mixto	9	3 in favour · 2 against · 3 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos	10	10 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc	35	35 against
GPlu	12	5 against · 7 abst.
Popular en el Congreso	88	87 in favour · 1 against
VOX	52	52 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Congreso de los Diputados, file 173/000009
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.

Retrieved 11 November 2026
Congreso de los Diputados, vote 3 of sitting 50
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 11 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error