Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion regarding the requirement for trade unions to have the obligation to make public all information related to acts of administrative management with economic or budgetary impact.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 28 March 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000996· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced28 March 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted30 March 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary5 April 2022All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Apr 2022Apr 2022Apr 2022Apr 202211. 28 March 2022: Presentación22. 30 March 2022: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 30/03/2022 hasta 05/04/202233. 30 March 2022: Calificación44. 5 April 2022: Pleno desde 05/04/2022 hasta 28/04/202255. 28 April 2022: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 28/04/2022 hasta 10/05/2022

28 April 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 64 yes · 196 no · 89 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the VOX Parliamentary Group, regarding requiring trade unions to have the obligation to make public all information related to acts of administrative management with economic or budgetary impact. It is voted on in the terms resulting from the incorporation of the amendment submitted by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 20 of sitting 174· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Ciudadanos and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 4 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 1 most voted in favour; in 34, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 1
  • Against: 34
  • Abstained: 3
  • Tie: 14
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
13 against
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto11
3 in favour · 7 against · 1 abst.
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc33
33 against
GPlu12
12 against
Popular en el Congreso88
88 abst.
VOX52
52 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.