Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion on the increase of the gambling tax and the limitation of its advertising

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 29 October 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Republicano.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000870· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced29 October 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted3 November 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary5 November 2021All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Oct 2021Nov 2021Nov 2021Nov 2021Nov 202111. 29 October 2021: Presentación22. 3 November 2021: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 03/11/2021 hasta 05/11/202133. 3 November 2021: Calificación44. 5 November 2021: Pleno desde 05/11/2021 hasta 30/11/202155. 30 November 2021: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 30/11/2021 hasta 14/12/2021

30 November 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 33 yes · 202 no · 91 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Republican Parliamentary Group, on the increase of the gambling tax and the limitation of its advertising.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 136· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and GPlu. Against, most of Socialista and Popular en el Congreso. 9 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 6 most voted in favour; in 41, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 6
  • Against: 41
  • Abstained: 3
  • Tie: 2
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
117 against · 3 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto10
2 in favour · 2 against · 3 abst. · 3 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 abst.
Gcup-ec-gc34
30 abst. · 4 did not vote
GPlu12
7 in favour · 4 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso87
82 against · 5 did not vote
VOX52
1 against · 45 abst. · 6 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.