Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion on declaring the migratory crisis and the terrorist threat infiltrating through these same flows of illegal immigration into Spain, as well as the growing radicalization of young Muslims living in our country, as a 'situation of interest for National Security' for the prevention, protection, and deterrence of the process of entry and radicalization of jihadist terrorism in Spain

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 19 October 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000855· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced19 October 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted26 October 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary29 October 2021All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2021Mar 202211. 19 October 2021: Presentación22. 26 October 2021: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 26/10/2021 hasta 29/10/202133. 26 October 2021: Calificación44. 29 October 2021: Pleno desde 29/10/2021 hasta 18/05/202255. 18 May 2022: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 18/05/2022 hasta 26/05/2022

18 May 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 53 yes · 290 no · 1 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion of the VOX Parliamentary Group, relating to declaring the migratory crisis and the terrorist threat that infiltrates through those same flows of illegal immigration towards Spain, as well as the growing radicalization of young Muslims living in our country, as a "situation of interest for National Security" for the prevention, protection and deterrence of the process of entry and radicalization of jihadist terrorism in Spain.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 180· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 1 most voted in favour; in 51, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 1
  • Against: 51
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
13 against
Socialista120
119 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto11
1 in favour · 9 against · 1 abst.
Ciudadanos9
9 against
Gcup-ec-gc33
30 against · 3 did not vote
GPlu12
11 against · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
88 against
VOX52
52 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.