Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion on the recognition of the right to DA+ affective companionship.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 15 June 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000755· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced15 June 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted22 June 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary25 June 2021All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE22 December 2022It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Dec 202111. 15 June 2021: Presentación22. 22 June 2021: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 22/06/2021 hasta 25/06/202133. 22 June 2021: Calificación44. 25 June 2021: Pleno desde 25/06/2021 hasta 22/12/202255. 22 December 2022: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 22/12/2022 hasta 24/01/2023

22 December 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 295 yes · 0 no · 50 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, on the recognition of the right to DA+ affective companionship. Voted in the terms of the transitory amendment submitted by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, the Confederal Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común Parliamentary Group, the Republican Parliamentary Group, the Plural Parliamentary Group (Mr. Boadella Esteve) and the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Mrs. Fernández Pérez and Mr. Martínez Oblanca).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 358 of sitting 229· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu and Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 51 most voted in favour; in 0, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 51
  • Against: 0
  • Abstained: 1
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
119 in favour · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto11
11 in favour
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc33
33 in favour
GPlu12
11 in favour · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
87 in favour · 1 did not vote
VOX52
1 in favour · 50 abst. · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.