Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion on measures aimed at preventing and tackling the phenomenon of 'okupación'.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 18 September 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000386· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced18 September 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted22 September 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary25 September 2020All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Sept 2020Sept 2020Oct 2020Oct 2020Oct 202011. 18 September 2020: Presentación22. 22 September 2020: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 22/09/2020 hasta 25/09/202033. 22 September 2020: Calificación44. 25 September 2020: Pleno desde 25/09/2020 hasta 01/10/202055. 1 October 2020: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 01/10/2020 hasta 07/10/2020

1 October 2020

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 154 yes · 180 no · 14 abst.

Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, on measures aimed at preventing and tackling the phenomenon of "squatting". Voted in the terms of the transactional amendment submitted by the Popular Group in the Congress, the VOX Parliamentary Group, and the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 47· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista and Gcup-ec-gc. 8 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 19 most voted in favour; in 21, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 19
  • Against: 21
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
13 against
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 abst.
Mixto9
5 in favour · 3 against · 1 abst.
Ciudadanos10
10 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc35
35 against
GPlu12
4 against · 7 abst. · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
87 in favour · 1 did not vote
VOX52
52 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.