Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Non-legislative motion regarding the removal of inviolability and other figures of 'special judicial protection' for members of the royal family.

Plenary step 5 of 7 · Rejected

It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 14 July 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Republicano.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000339· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced14 July 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted2 September 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary8 September 2020All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Sept 2020Dec 202011. 14 July 2020: Presentación22. 2 September 2020: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 02/09/2020 hasta 08/09/202033. 2 September 2020: Calificación44. 8 September 2020: Pleno desde 08/09/2020 hasta 25/02/202155. 25 February 2021: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 25/02/2021 hasta 04/03/2021

25 February 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 74 yes · 276 no

Voted on: Non-legislative motion from the Republican Parliamentary Group, regarding the elimination of inviolability and other figures of "special judicial protection" for members of the royal family.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 79· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Socialista, Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 7 most voted in favour; in 45, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 7
  • Against: 45
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto9
3 in favour · 6 against
Ciudadanos10
10 against
Gcup-ec-gc35
35 in favour
GPlu12
12 in favour
Popular en el Congreso88
88 against
VOX52
52 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.