What it is
Non-legislative motion on measures to reinforce protocols for the prevention, detection, and action in situations of abuse, aggression, and sexual exploitation such as those that have occurred continuously in centers for minors under the guardianship of the Consell de Mallorca, and on the actions carried out by the State Security Forces and Corps regarding the alleged sexual assault committed by several young people against a minor in Palma in the early hours of 24 and 25/12/2019.
It is a non-binding motion. It was introduced on 21 January 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Ciudadanos.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000060· updated 11 Nov
We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 5 of 7 steps. It reached Plenary, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced21 January 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted23 January 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary28 January 2020All 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
25 February 2020
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Non-legislative motion by the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group, on measures to strengthen the protocols for the prevention, detection and action in situations of abuse, aggression and sexual exploitation such as those that have occurred continuously in centers for minors under the guardianship of the Consell de Mallorca, and on the actions carried out by the State Security Forces and Corps regarding the alleged sexual assault committed by several young people against a minor in Palma in the early hours of 24 and 25/12/2019. Voted on in the terms of the compromise amendment submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, the VOX Parliamentary Group, the Ciudadanos Parliamentary Group and the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Mr. Martínez Oblanca).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 11· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 6 yes · 23 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 19 yes · 17 no
- Málaga Tie 5 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València Tie 7 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 16 most voted in favour; in 21, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 16
- Against: 21
- Tie: 15
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 9 | 3 in favour · 2 against · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 10 | 10 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 32 against · 3 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 12 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 83 in favour · 5 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 49 in favour · 3 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 162/000060
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 11
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.