Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Inquiry Committee regarding the illegal use of personnel, means and resources of the Ministry of the Interior, with the aim of favoring the political interests of the PP and of nullifying incriminating evidence against this party in cases of corruption, during the terms of Government of the People's Party.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed

Type of initiative: comision de investigacion art 52. It was introduced on 1 October 2020. Introduced by: Pleno del Congreso.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 152/000002· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.

  1. Introduced1 October 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted1 October 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
  4. Committee22 December 2020A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenary22 December 2021All 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOE3 February 2022It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 5 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2020Mar 2021Jun 2021Sept 2021Dec 202111. 1 October 2020: Presentación22. 1 October 2020: Calificación33. 22 December 2020: Comisión Investig. utilización ilegal recursos Ministerio del Interior Dictamen desde 22/12/2020 hasta 22/12/202144. 22 December 2021: Pleno Aprobación desde 22/12/2021 hasta 03/02/202255. 3 February 2022: Concluido - (Aprobado con modificaciones) desde 03/02/2022 hasta 23/02/2022

3 February 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 195 yes · 91 no · 63 abst.

Voted on: Vote on the Report of the Investigation Committee regarding the illegal use of personnel, means and resources of the Ministry of the Interior, with the aim of favoring the political interests of the PP and of nullifying incriminating evidence for this party in cases of corruption, during the mandates of the Popular Party Government.

This law had 9 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 26 of sitting 149· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 32 most voted in favour; in 3, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 32
  • Against: 3
  • Abstained: 1
  • Tie: 16
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 in favour
Socialista120
120 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 abst.
Mixto10
2 in favour · 3 against · 5 abst.
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc34
34 in favour
GPlu12
12 in favour
Popular en el Congreso88
88 against
VOX52
52 abst.

What happens next

What happens now?

It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.