What it is
The State can take control of SAREB Company created in 2012 to manage and sell the assets (loans and real estate) removed from restructured banks during the financial crisis., plus other changes
It is a royal decree-law. It was introduced on 19 January 2022. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Royal Decree-Law 1/2022, of January 18, amending Law 9/2012, of November 14, on the restructuring and resolution of credit institutions; Law 11/2015, of June 18, on the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment service firms; and Royal Decree 1559/2012, of November 15, establishing the legal regime of asset management companies, regarding the legal regime of the Asset Management Company arising from the Banking Restructuring.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000073· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- Limits on the State's stake in SAREB are removed. The FROB Fund for the Orderly Restructuring of Banks (Fondo de reestructuración ordenada bancaria), a public body that manages resolution processes for credit institutions. may acquire and hold 50% or more of the shares, with approval from its Governing Commission and a prior report from the State's General Intervention Body.
- Even if the FROB takes control, SAREB will remain governed by private law and will not become a state-owned commercial company. It must adapt to the new rules within a maximum of 3 months from the FROB reaching a majority, except for severance pay under commercial or senior management contracts, which applies from the law's entry into force.
- Holdings the FROB acquires through its resolution functions will not be part of the Patrimony of Public Administrations. Also, decisions on its portfolio will be made by the Governing Commission in reduced composition, with the chair and representatives of two ministries, so supervisors do not take part in strategic decisions.
- SAREB may transfer real estate to public bodies or nonprofits for social housing or other socially useful purposes, weighing that usefulness within its goal of maximizing value. Notarial and registry actions needed for these transfers will not incur notary or registry fees.
- Section d) of Article 84.2 of the Workers' Statute is corrected, and the rules for public sector labor staff are clarified. Permanent and discontinuous permanent contracts require express justification and, if a specific replacement rate is needed, authorization from the Ministry of Finance and Public Function.
- For declaring or reviewing high tourist traffic zones in 2022, 2021 data will not be used. Instead, the average for 2017, 2018 and 2019, before the COVID-19 pandemic, will apply.
Who it affects
- SAREB and its shareholders: The State can increase its stake and the FROB can take control without the company switching to public law.
- The FROB: It can buy more than 50% of SAREB and decides on its portfolio through the reduced Governing Commission.
- Public sector labor staff: Permanent and discontinuous permanent contracts require express justification and possible Finance Ministry authorizations.
- Businesses in tourist areas: They can keep or obtain high tourist traffic zone status using 2017 to 2019 data instead of 2021 data.
- Public bodies and nonprofits focused on social housing: They can receive real estate transferred by SAREB without paying notary or registry fees.
Words worth knowing
- SAREB
- Company created in 2012 to manage and sell the assets (loans and real estate) removed from restructured banks during the financial crisis.
- FROB
- Fund for the Orderly Restructuring of Banks (Fondo de reestructuración ordenada bancaria), a public body that manages resolution processes for credit institutions.
- Bank resolution
- Process to reorganize or wind down a troubled bank while protecting the financial system.
- Tasa de reposición
- Replacement rate: a cap set each year in the state budget law on how many public sector jobs can be filled based on vacancies.
- Zona de gran afluencia turística
- High tourist traffic zone: an area that, due to its many visitors, may allow shops to open longer than standard hours.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced19 January 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted25 January 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary25 January 2022All 350 deputies vote.
- Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEno dateIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
3 February 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Processing as a Government bill by the urgent procedure of Royal Decree-Law 1/2022, of January 18, amending Law 9/2012, of November 14, on the restructuring and resolution of credit institutions; Law 11/2015, of June 18, on the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment service firms; and Royal Decree 1559/2012, of November 15, establishing the legal regime of asset management companies, regarding the legal regime of the Asset Management Company arising from the Banking Restructuring.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 23 of sitting 149· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 32 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 36 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 10 yes · 1 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 14 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 10 | 10 in favour |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 34 | 32 in favour · 2 against |
| GPlu | 12 | 10 in favour · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 52 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000073
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 23 of sitting 149
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2022-800
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.