What it is
Measures to restart the courts after the COVID-19 state of alarm
It is a royal decree-law. It was introduced on 29 April 2020. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Royal Decree-Law 16/2020, of April 28, on procedural and organizational measures to address COVID-19 in the field of the Administration of Justice.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000017· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- August 11 to 31, 2020 are declared, exceptionally, as working days for all court proceedings, except Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, to keep courts active during a month that is normally a recess.
- Procedural deadlines suspended by the state of alarm start counting again from the beginning, and the deadline to appeal judgments and decisions notified during the suspension, or in the twenty working days after it ends, is extended.
- A special, fast-track family procedure is created to quickly handle, during the state of alarm and up to three months after it ends, claims to rebalance custody or visitation schedules and to review child support or spousal payments when financial circumstances changed because of the crisis.
- In insolvency matters, the duty to file for bankruptcy is postponed until December 31, 2020, and courts will not accept involuntary bankruptcy petitions filed since the state of alarm began, giving companies time to restructure their debt.
- During the state of alarm and up to three months after, court proceedings are held preferably by remote video attendance, public access to hearings is limited, and public service at courts is provided by phone or email, with in-person visits only by appointment when strictly necessary.
- Self-employed workers who, without stopping their activity, saw their revenue drop by at least 75 percent because of the crisis can access their pension plans, and deadlines are extended for vulnerable tenants of their primary home to request a deferral of rent payments.
Who it affects
- Citizens with pending lawsuits or court procedures: Procedural deadlines restart from zero and they get more time to appeal.
- Families with custody, visitation or support arrangements: They can use a fast procedure to review them if the crisis affected them.
- Companies, self-employed workers and insolvent businesses: They gain time to avoid bankruptcy or liquidation and restructure their debts.
- Vulnerable tenants of their primary home: They have more time to request a deferral of rent payments.
- Court and prosecution staff: They work in morning or afternoon shifts and hold proceedings remotely.
Words worth knowing
- Plazo procesal
- The maximum time the law allows to complete a court step, such as filing an appeal.
- Concurso de acreedores
- A court procedure for a company or person that cannot pay its debts (Spanish insolvency proceeding).
- Convenio concursal
- An agreement between the insolvent company and its creditors to pay the debts and avoid liquidation.
- Presencia telemática
- Taking part in a court hearing remotely, by video or other electronic means.
- Expediente de regulación temporal de empleo (ERTE)
- A measure allowing a company to temporarily suspend or reduce its employees' work and wages.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced29 April 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted5 May 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsno dateGroups propose changes.
- Committeeno dateA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary5 May 2020All 350 deputies vote.
- Senateno dateThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEno dateIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 4 official steps on a timeline
13 May 2020
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Processing as a Government bill by the urgent procedure of Royal Decree-Law 16/2020, of April 28, on procedural and organizational measures to address COVID-19 in the field of the Administration of Justice.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 21· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 31 yes · 1 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 35 yes · 1 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 15 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 9 | 8 in favour · 1 against |
| Ciudadanos | 10 | 10 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 34 in favour · 1 against |
| GPlu | 12 | 11 in favour · 1 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 87 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 52 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
Published in the BOE: Royal Decree-Law 16/2020, of April 28, on procedural and organizational measures to address COVID-19 in the field of the Administration of Justice.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 130/000017
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 4 of sitting 21
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2020-4705
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.