Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to clarify extensions of coastal concessions in Spain

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 28 December 2021. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma de Cantabria - Parlamento.

Official title: Private member's bill amending Ley 22/1988, of 28 July, on Coasts.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000014· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The Parliament of Cantabria proposes to amend the Coastal Law to clarify how extensions of concessions occupying the public maritime-terrestrial zone work. According to the explanatory statement, recent court interpretations have caused problems and lawsuits.
  2. The bill would add that the rule allowing only occupations that cannot be located anywhere else would not apply to extensions of concessions under Law 2/2013. Existing uses would be respected in those extensions.
  3. It would also establish that the maximum time limits of the Coastal Law do not restrict the duration of those extensions. In addition, concession periods could be extended if the holder presents beach regeneration or coastal erosion and climate change projects, without ever exceeding 75 years.
  4. A transitional provision would treat all interested parties equally, whether or not they have gone to court. Those with a final court ruling against them could request a new extension procedure within two months.

Who it affects

  • Holders of concessions occupying the public maritime-terrestrial zone: Would see the rules for extending their coastal concessions clarified and could keep their existing uses.
  • People with a final ruling or pending lawsuits over these extensions: Could request a new extension procedure within two months of the law taking effect, or drop their lawsuits and request the extension.
  • Government bodies that grant the concessions: Would have to process and decide extensions under the clarified rules.

Words worth knowing

Dominio público marítimo-terrestre
The zone of beaches, shores and waters that belongs to everyone and is managed by the State.
Concesión
An administrative permit to use that public zone for a period of time.
Prórroga
An extension of the time limit of an already granted permit.
Vía contencioso-administrativa
Going to court to challenge decisions made by public authorities.
Sentencia firme
A court ruling against which no further appeals are possible.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced28 December 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted11 January 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2021Jan 2022Feb 2022Mar 2022Apr 202211. 28 December 2021: Presentación22. 11 January 2022: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 11/01/2022 hasta 14/01/202233. 11 January 2022: Calificación44. 14 January 2022: Gobierno Contestación desde 14/01/2022 hasta 08/03/202255. 8 March 2022: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 08/03/2022 hasta 12/05/202266. 12 May 2022: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 12/05/2022 hasta 18/05/2022

12 May 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 150 yes · 174 no · 8 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Parliament of Cantabria, amending Law 22/1988, of July 28, on Coasts.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 12 of sitting 178· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Gcup-ec-gc. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 19 most voted in favour; in 20, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 19
  • Against: 20
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
13 against
Socialista120
117 against · 3 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto11
6 in favour · 5 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc33
31 against · 2 did not vote
GPlu12
2 against · 8 abst. · 2 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
84 in favour · 4 did not vote
VOX52
51 in favour · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.