Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to raise the campaign spending limit for small parties

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 2 March 2020. Introduced by: Comunidad Foral de Navarra - Parlamento.

Official title: Private member's bill on partial modification of the Organic Law on the General Electoral Regime and the Organic Law on the Financing of Political Parties (Organic).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000011· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would raise the campaign spending limit for municipal elections: 0.11 euros per resident in municipalities with more than 20,000 residents and 0.22 euros in smaller ones. Parties running in at least 25 % of a province's municipalities could also spend an extra 150,301.11 euros for each province where they meet that condition.
  2. The bill would change the penalties for exceeding the spending limit. The minimum fine of 50,000 euros would apply only to very serious violations, and the minimum fines for serious and minor ones would be removed; those fines would range from double to five times the overspending.
  3. The text justifies the changes because the current limit is not enough to run a campaign, and because for small parties running in a single district even a tiny overspend can trigger a disproportionate 50,000-euro fine.
  4. The changes would also apply to parties that took part in the 2019 municipal elections by running candidates in a single electoral district.

Who it affects

  • Parties, federations, coalitions and groups running in municipalities, especially small ones running in a single district.: They would get a higher spending limit and less disproportionate penalties if they exceed it.
  • Parties running in at least 25 % of a province's municipalities.: They could spend an extra 150,301.11 euros for each province where they meet that condition.
  • Parties that took part in the municipal elections called by Royal Decree 209/2019, of April 1.: The new rules would also apply to them if they ran candidates in a single district.

Words worth knowing

Circunscripción electoral (electoral district)
A division of the territory, such as a province or a municipality, from which candidates run.
Población de derecho (registered population)
The number of people officially registered as living in a municipality.
Infracción muy grave, grave o leve (very serious, serious or minor violation)
Categories of legal violations, ordered from most to least serious.
Tribunal de Cuentas (Court of Auditors)
A public body that audits accounts, including parties' campaign spending.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced2 March 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted10 March 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 7 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2020Jun 2020Sept 2020Dec 2020Mar 2021Jun 202111. 2 March 2020: Presentación22. 10 March 2020: Mesa del Congreso Requerimiento de antecedentes desde 10/03/2020 hasta 05/06/202033. 10 March 2020: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 10/03/2020 hasta 13/03/202044. 10 March 2020: Calificación55. 13 March 2020: Gobierno Contestación desde 13/03/2020 hasta 16/05/202066. 16 May 2020: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 16/05/2020 hasta 14/09/202177. 14 September 2021: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 14/09/2021 hasta 11/10/2021

14 September 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 61 yes · 174 no · 95 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill from the Parliament of Navarra, on partial modification of the Organic Law on the General Electoral Regime and the Organic Law on the Financing of Political Parties (Organic).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 115· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos and Gcup-ec-gc. Against, most of Socialista and VOX. 6 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 4 most voted in favour; in 35, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 4
  • Against: 35
  • Abstained: 3
  • Tie: 10
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 in favour
Republicano13
13 did not vote
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 in favour
Mixto10
4 in favour · 2 against · 2 abst. · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc35
35 in favour
GPlu12
2 in favour · 5 abst. · 5 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
88 abst.
VOX52
52 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.