What it is
State fund to compensate asbestos victims
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 3 December 2019. Introduced by: Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco - Parlamento.
Official title: Private member's bill to create a compensation fund for victims of asbestos (corresponding to file number 125/000015/0000 of the XIII Legislature).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000009· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would create a Compensation Fund for Asbestos Victims, managed by the National Social Security Institute, to repair health damage from asbestos exposure at work, at home, or in the environment.
- Those eligible would include people with a recognized occupational disease caused by asbestos, people whose illness was mainly or partly caused by asbestos, and the heirs of both groups.
- The process would start with an application to the National Social Security Institute, which must issue a proposed decision within three months. If there is no express response within six months, the application is deemed rejected.
- The Fund would start operating the day its implementing regulation takes effect, which must be issued within three months of the law's publication, and the law would enter into force twenty days after publication in the official state gazette.
Who it affects
- People with asbestos-related illnesses: Could apply for financial compensation for asbestos-related health damage without going to court.
- Relatives or heirs of victims: Could receive the compensation if the affected person has died.
- National Social Security Institute (Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social): Would process applications, issue decisions, and pay compensation from the Fund.
- Unions, employers, experts, and asbestos victims' associations: Would sit on the monitoring commission, which advises and proposes improvements, without pay.
Words worth knowing
- Causahabientes
- People who inherit another person's rights, for example their heirs when they die.
- Mesotelioma
- A type of cancer linked to asbestos exposure.
- Silencio administrativo
- When the administration does not answer within the set period and the law treats a response as given; here, the application is considered rejected.
- Fondo carente de personalidad jurídica
- A pool of money managed by a public body, without being a separate legal entity.
It summarizes the text passed by the committee. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced3 December 2019Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted13 December 2019The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments23 April 2021Groups propose changes.
- Committee3 March 2022A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenaryno dateAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senate13 July 2022The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE5 October 2022It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
13 April 2021
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Basque Parliament, to create a compensation fund for victims of asbestos (corresponding to file number 125/000015/0000 of the XIII Legislature).
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 89· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Badajoz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 30 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Cádiz More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Córdoba More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 30 yes · 0 no · 7 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Sevilla More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu, Sin grupo and Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 50 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 50
- Against: 0
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 1
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 in favour · 1 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 10 | 9 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 8 | 8 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 34 | 34 in favour |
| GPlu | 12 | 12 in favour |
| Sin grupo | 2 | 2 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 52 abst. |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 125/000009
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 89
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.